I'm going through Landau's Mechanics, and on the chapter about oscillations of systems with more than one degree of freedom, he goes from the characteristic equation $$\sum_{k}(-\omega^2m_{ik}+k_{ik})A_k=0$$ and he requires the determinant of the coefficients must vanish $$|k_{ik}-\omega^2m_{ik}|=0$$ so far so standard, but then he substitutes each $\omega_\alpha$ back into the sum to find the corresponding coefficients. At this stage he claims that if all eigenvalues $\omega_\alpha$ are distinct, then the coefficients $A_k$ are proportional to the minors of the determinant with $\omega=\omega_\alpha$. How does he arrive at this result? I know there is an answer to this on the physics stack exchange which amounts to "try it and see that it works". So far my guess is that it has something to do with finding the inverse using Cramer's rule, since he later states that this step is diagonalising the $m+k$ matrix, but in that case I think there would be some extra terms from the $(m+k)$ matrix itself, since it gets left multiplied after the diagonalised matrix $(m+k)D(m+k)^{-1}$. Is there a mathematically rigorous method to come to his conclusion?
2026-04-11 14:50:36.1775919036
General solution of a system with distinct eigenvalues
35 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in LINEAR-ALGEBRA
- An underdetermined system derived for rotated coordinate system
- How to prove the following equality with matrix norm?
- Alternate basis for a subspace of $\mathcal P_3(\mathbb R)$?
- Why the derivative of $T(\gamma(s))$ is $T$ if this composition is not a linear transformation?
- Why is necessary ask $F$ to be infinite in order to obtain: $ f(v)=0$ for all $ f\in V^* \implies v=0 $
- I don't understand this $\left(\left[T\right]^B_C\right)^{-1}=\left[T^{-1}\right]^C_B$
- Summation in subsets
- $C=AB-BA$. If $CA=AC$, then $C$ is not invertible.
- Basis of span in $R^4$
- Prove if A is regular skew symmetric, I+A is regular (with obstacles)
Related Questions in ORDINARY-DIFFERENTIAL-EQUATIONS
- The Runge-Kutta method for a system of equations
- Analytical solution of a nonlinear ordinary differential equation
- Stability of system of ordinary nonlinear differential equations
- Maximal interval of existence of the IVP
- Power series solution of $y''+e^xy' - y=0$
- Change of variables in a differential equation
- Dimension of solution space of homogeneous differential equation, proof
- Solve the initial value problem $x^2y'+y(x-y)=0$
- Stability of system of parameters $\kappa, \lambda$ when there is a zero eigenvalue
- Derive an equation with Faraday's law
Related Questions in DETERMINANT
- Form square matrix out of a non square matrix to calculate determinant
- Let $T:V\to W$ on finite dimensional vector spaces, is it possible to use the determinant to determine that $T$ is invertible.
- Optimization over images of column-orthogonal matrices through rotations and reflections
- Effect of adding a zero row and column on the eigenvalues of a matrix
- Geometric intuition behind determinant properties
- Help with proof or counterexample: $A^3=0 \implies I_n+A$ is invertible
- Prove that every matrix $\in\mathbb{R}^{3\times3}$ with determinant equal 6 can be written as $AB$, when $|B|=1$ and $A$ is the given matrix.
- Properties of determinant exponent
- How to determine the characteristic polynomial of the $4\times4$ real matrix of ones?
- The determinant of the sum of a positive definite matrix with a symmetric singular matrix
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
Your question can be reduced to finding a kernel vector for $M$, $Mx=0$, where $M$ has co-rank 1.
This has as direct consequence that not all minors $\det M_{ik}$ can be zero, as then the co-rank would be two or larger. $M_{ik}$ is here the sub-matrix $M$ obtained by deleting row $i$ and column $k$, crossing at the matrix element $m_{ik}$.
With one such non-zero minor fixed, set $x_l=(-1)^{k+l}\det(M_{il})$. It follows that $\sum m_{jl}x_l$ for $j\ne i$ is the Laplace expansion for the row $i$ of the determinant of the matrix $M$ modified so that instead of row $i$ the row $j$ is repeated, so that the value zero results. If $j=i$, then this combination is just the determinant of $M$, which is zero by assumption.
Thus we have a non-zero solution.