General Solution To Helmholtz Equation in Cylindrical Coordinates Seems To Be Wrong

57 Views Asked by At

On the web, it is given that the general solution to the Helmholtz equation ($\nabla^2u+ku=0$) in cylindrical coordinates is

$$\sum_{m=0}^\infty\sum_{n=0}^\infty{[A_{mn}\cdot J_m(\sqrt{k^2 - n^2}\cdot r) + B_{mn}\cdot Y_m(\sqrt{k^2 - n^2}\cdot r)]\cdot [C_m\cdot \cos(m\varphi) + D_m\cdot \sin(m\varphi)]\cdot[E_n\cdot e^{nz}+F_ne^{-nz}]}$$

Where $J_m, Y_m$ are the Bessel functions of the first and second kind respectively.

My problem with this: I see no reason for $n$ (one of the separation variables) to be quantized. On Wolfram MathWorld, it's just stated that some equation involving $n$ is a modified Bessel equation, and then they give the solution. But the Bessel equation, as far as I know, has a continuous range of solutions ($J_v(x), v\in\mathbb{R})$, so there is no reason for $n$ to quantize. Furthermore, at least with how I learned it in class, the linear combination of $J_v, Y_v$ is only relevant when $v$ is an integer, and otherwise you use the linear combination of $J_v, J_{-v}$.

If $n$ isn't quantized then, should we have an integral over all possible $n$'s? This isn't something I've seen anywhere, but I don't understand what makes $n$ quantized. For $m$ for example, it's the condition that $\Theta(\theta)=\Theta(\theta+2\pi)$.

Thanks.