$\DeclareMathOperator*{\argmin}{arg\,min}$ The Chebyshev polynomials $$T_n(x) := \cosh(n \, \cosh^{-1}(x))$$ (with potentially complex $\cosh^{-1}(x)$) are well known to satisfy $$ \frac{T_n\left(\tfrac{x - m}{b-a}\right)}{\left|T_n\left(\tfrac{- m}{b-a}\right)\right|} = \argmin_{p \in \mathcal{P}_n, \, p(0) = 1} \, \, \max_{x \in [a,b]} |p(x)|, \qquad a,b > 0, \, m := \tfrac{a+b}{2}. $$ Are there any results for the problem $$ \min_{p \in \mathcal{P}_n, \, p(0) = 1} \, \, \max_{x \in [-d,-c] \cup [a,b]} |p(x)|, \qquad a,b,c,d >0, $$ i.e. if we want to minimise the polynomial on two intervals on both sides of the origin?
The background to this question is that I want to estimate the rate of convergence of GMRES applied to a matrix with eigenvalues clustered in two intervals as described above.
This is not an answer "per se" but a (double) hint, each one with a graphics.
1) First, a graphical representation of the modulus of the 30th Legendre Polynomial $P_{30}(x)$.
One can see that the big fluctuations are at the bounds of interval $[-1,1]$
This kind of polynomial seems to fit to your desire...
But, as regards a minimax property, I dont know if there is one...
2) In second, here is another family of polynomials (see graphics below) which might be of larger interest for you. They are almost not known outside the electronics community (with which I have had the opportunity to work at some time). They are conceived in order to be very smooth (stability) with a very sharp ascent (neat "cutting frequencies"). They are derived from the Legendre polynomials by different operations (change of variables, squaring, integration,...). The mode of generation is rather well described in the file called "Notes on "L" Optimal filters by C. Bond (2011)" that can be accessed through (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Optimum_%22L%22_filter).
The polynomial associated with the figure (found in the final list given in the said document) is
$$P(x)=10x^4 - 120x^6 + 615 x^8 - 1624x^{10} + 2310x^{12} - 1680 x^{14} + 490x^{16}$$
Remark 1: With a degree 16, about half of the other, one achieves much better properties...
Remark 2: Thes polynomials are positive: no need to take their modulus (I know this is a "real values" concern, and not a "complex values" concern...)