Define $\displaystyle F(s) = \sum_{n=0}^\infty f_ns^n$, where $f_n= P($ the first return to the origin at time $n)$. Suppose $F^{(n)}(s) = \displaystyle \sum_{k=0}^\infty f_k^{(n)} s^k$, where $f_k^{(n)}$ denotes the probability of the $n$th return to the origin at time $k$, prove that $F^{(n)}(s)=[F(s)]^n$
We defined the notation $F^{(n)}$ as $F$ composed with itself $n$ times.
Here are some results that I have proved that may or may not be helpful (not in order):
Let $u_n = P ($the walk returns to the origin at time $ n)$ and $U(s), s \in [0,1)$ be the generating function corresponding to $u_n$. Then $U(s) = (1-s^2)^{-\frac{1}{2}}$
For any $n \in \mathbb{N}$, we have ${{2n \choose n} \cdot (\frac{1}{2})^{2n}} = (-1)^n {-\frac{1}{2} \choose n}$
$U(s) = \frac{1}{1-F(s)}=1- \frac{1}{F(s)}$
If the random walk is asymmetric with forward probability $p$ and backward probability $q$ and $p+q=1$, then the probability of a return to the origin in finite time is $1-|p-q|$.
$F'(1)=\infty$ when $p=q=\frac{1}{2}$. That is, the expected waiting time until the first return to the origin is infinite.
Without using facts about generating functions (since it wasn't covered in 251).
$$ \textbf{Base case: n=1} $$
This follows directly from definition. So assume the proposition is true for n.
$$ \textbf{Induction step: n+1} $$
First note that the probability of the $n+1$th return to the origin at time $k$ is equal to the probability of first return to the origin at time $k-2$ times the probability of $n$th return to the origin at time $2$, and so on. In other words,
$$ f_k^{(n+1)} = \sum_{i=0}^{k} f_i^{(n)}f_{k-i} $$
Therefore,
$$ \begin{aligned} F^{(n+1)}(s) &= \sum_{k=0}^{\infty} f_k^{(n+1)}s^k \\ &= \sum_{k=0}^{\infty}\sum_{i=0}^{k}f_i^{(n)}f_{k-i} s^k \\ &= \sum_{i=0}^{\infty}\sum_{k=i}^{\infty}f_i^{(n)}f_{k-i} s^k \\ &= \sum_{i=0}^{\infty} f_i^{(n)}s^i\sum_{k=0}^{\infty} f_k s^{k} \\ &= \left[F(s)\right]^{n}\left[F(s)\right] \end{aligned} $$
By induction, we prove that our proposition is true for all $n+1\in \mathbb{N}$ given that it is true for $n$.
Useful tips:
For changing the order of summation, it is often useful to first set it up as an inequality, e.g. for the above example, we notice that:
$0\leq i\leq k\leq \infty$.
That means we can split it up into:
$0\leq i\leq k$ and $i\leq k\leq \infty$
but also
$0\leq i\leq \infty$ and $i\leq k\leq \infty$
which still fully describes the relationship between the 4 numbers.
Let me know if there are any issues or errors with this answer.