I am trying to understand why geodesic flow on a compact surface of constant negative curvature is an Anosov flow. Klingenberg's book, Riemannian Geometry, says that in this case, the proof is very short: the Jacobi fields are of the form $\xi_s(t) = e^{-tk}\xi_s(0); \xi_u(t) = e^{tk}\xi_u(0)$ where $-k^2$ is the curvature of the surface. Can someone explain how precisely to identify these Jacobi fields with the expanding and contracting directions of an Anosov flow? Thank you!
2026-04-24 07:24:00.1777015440
Geodesic Flow is an Anosov Flow
621 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in DYNAMICAL-SYSTEMS
- Stability of system of parameters $\kappa, \lambda$ when there is a zero eigenvalue
- Stability of stationary point $O(0,0)$ when eigenvalues are zero
- Determine $ \ a_{\max} \ $ and $ \ a_{\min} \ $ so that the above difference equation is well-defined.
- Question on designing a state observer for discrete time system
- How to analyze a dynamical system when $t\to\infty?$
- The system $x' = h(y), \space y' = ay + g(x)$ has no periodic solutions
- Existence of unique limit cycle for $r'=r(μ-r^2), \space θ' = ρ(r^2)$
- Including a time delay term for a differential equation
- Doubts in proof of topologically transitive + dense periodic points = Devaney Chaotic
- Condition for symmetric part of $A$ for $\|x(t)\|$ monotonically decreasing ($\dot{x} = Ax(t)$)
Related Questions in RIEMANNIAN-GEOMETRY
- What is the correct formula for the Ricci curvature of a warped manifold?
- How to show that extension of linear connection commutes with contraction.
- geodesic of infinite length without self-intersections
- Levi-Civita-connection of an embedded submanifold is induced by the orthogonal projection of the Levi-Civita-connection of the original manifold
- Geodesically convex neighborhoods
- The induced Riemannian metric is not smooth on the diagonal
- Intrinsic vs. Extrinsic notions of Harmonic maps.
- Equivalence of different "balls" in Riemannian manifold.
- Why is the index of a harmonic map finite?
- A closed manifold of negative Ricci curvature has no conformal vector fields
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
At a tangent vector $v \in T_p M$, the tangent space $T_v (TM)$ to the tangent bundle decomposes as a direct sum $T_p M \oplus T_p M$ by sending a vector $X \in T_v TM$ to its horizontal and vertical components. (This decomposition uses the connection on $M$.) I assume you're familiar with this idea. This is an orthogonal decomposition under the Sasaki metric on the tangent bundle (this is in fact one definition of the Sasaki metric), so one can use it efficiently to compute norms.
Similarly, if $SM$ is the unit tangent bundle of $M$, and $v \in SM$, the tangent space $T_v SM$ decomposes into horizontal and vertical components as $T_p M \oplus v^{\perp}$, where $v^{\perp} \subset T_p M$ is the subspace orthogonal to $v$.
Let $\varphi_t : SM \to SM$ denote geodesic flow. The derivative $d\varphi_t : T_v SM \to T_{\varphi_t(v)} SM$ has a nice description in terms of the above decomposition. Namely, suppose $X \in T_v SM$ decomposes as $(X_H, X_V)$, where $X_H$ and $X_V$ are the horizontal and vertical components, respectively. Denote by $\gamma_v$ the geodesic through $v$ (with $\gamma(0) = p$, the footpoint of $v$). Then we can consider the Jacobi field $J$ along $\gamma_v$ defined by the initial conditions $J(0) = X_H, J'(0) = X_V$. Then $d\varphi_t$ takes $X$ to the vector whose decomposition is $J(t), J'(t)$, or, in other words:
Proposition. Let $w = \varphi_t(v)$, and denote by $p, q$ the footpoints of $v, w$, respectively. Then as a map $$ d\varphi_t : S_p M \oplus v^{\perp} \to S_q M \oplus w^{\perp}, $$ $d\varphi_t$ is uniquely defined by the condition that for any Jacobi field $J$ along $\gamma_v$ (with $J'(0) \in v^{\perp}$), we have $$ d\varphi_t\Big(J(0), J'(0)\Big) = \Big(J(t), J'(t)\Big). $$ This theorem is basically obvious when you work through the definitions. Namely, one takes a path in $TM$ representing the tangent vector $\big(J(0), J'(0)\big)$; this gives rise (by geodesic flow) to a variation of geodesics of $\gamma_v$, and one checks that under our identifications $J$ is in fact the variation field of this variation. The claim follows.
With this in mind, it's easy to use the above description to obtain the Anosov decomposition. Namely, the unstable subspace of $T_v SM$ is spanned by pairs $\big(\xi_u(0), \xi_u'(0)\big)$ and the stable by pairs $\big(\xi_s(0), \xi_s'(0)\big)$. That these are in fact stable/unstable subspaces follows by direct computation.