I learned how to find local error in Euler's method and it is proportional to $\frac {h^2} {2}$ . I can understand this. But when we calculate the global error, why do we just multiply by the number of steps and say global error is proportional to $h$? I mean I've been taught that global error is proportional to $\frac {h^2} 2 \frac {t_f} h$ where $\frac {t_f} h$. I can see $\frac {t_f} h$ is the number of steps. But I think the global error should be $$\frac {h^2} 2 l_1 +\frac {h^2} 2l_2 + ... +\frac {h^2} 2l_n$$ where $n$ is the number of steps. So, I think the global error is just proportional to $\frac {h^2} 2$ not $h$. Could you explain why the global error is proportional to $h$? Thank you!
2026-04-29 11:51:49.1777463509
global error in Euler's method
795 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in NUMERICAL-METHODS
- The Runge-Kutta method for a system of equations
- How to solve the exponential equation $e^{a+bx}+e^{c+dx}=1$?
- Is the calculated solution, if it exists, unique?
- Modified conjugate gradient method to minimise quadratic functional restricted to positive solutions
- Minimum of the 2-norm
- Is method of exhaustion the same as numerical integration?
- Prove that Newton's Method is invariant under invertible linear transformations
- Initial Value Problem into Euler and Runge-Kutta scheme
- What are the possible ways to write an equation in $x=\phi(x)$ form for Iteration method?
- Numerical solution for a two dimensional third order nonlinear differential equation
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
If you posit that for the exact solution you get the formula $$ y(t_k+h)=y(t_k)+hf(t_k,y(t_k))+\frac{h^2}{2}l_k $$ where $l_k=y''(t_k+\theta_kh)$, $θ_k\in(0,1)$, then the error $e_k=y_k-y(t_k)$ propagates as $$ |e_{k+1}|=\left|e_k+h[f(t_k,y_k)-f(t_k,y(t_k))]-\frac{h^2}{2}l_k\right| \le |e_k|+hL|e_k|+\frac{h^2}{2}|l_k| $$ so that $$ |e_k|\le\sum_{j=0}^{k-1}(1+Lh)^{k-j-1}\frac{h^2}{2}|l_j| $$ You can now interpret this sum after further relaxing $(1+Lh)\le e^{Lh}$ as a Riemann sum for $$ |e_k|\lessapprox\frac{h}2\int_{t_0}^{t_k} e^{L(t_k-s)}|y''(s)|\,ds $$ or use a bound $M_2$ on the second derivative $y''(t)=f_t(t,y(t))+f_x(t,y(t))f(t,y(t))$ and the geometric sum formula $$ |e_k|\le\frac{(1+Lh)^k-1}{(1+Lh)-1}\frac{h^2}2M_2=\frac{M_2}{2L}[(1+Lh)^k-1]h \le\frac{M_2}{2L}[e^{L(t_k-t_0)}-1]h. $$