When constructing a detection test between two Gaussian vectors, I have $H_0: \mathcal{N}(0, \sigma_n^2)$ and $H_1: \mathcal{N}(0,\sigma_n^2 + \sigma_s^2)$, and $\sigma_n^2$ is unknown under finite samples collected, while $\sigma_s^2$ in known. Since both hypotheses are composite, I construct the GLRT while looking for ML estimate of $\sigma_n^2$ under both hypothesis. Unfortunately, I come up with both $f_0(\widehat{\sigma_w^2})$ and $f_1(\widehat{\sigma_w^2})$ to be equal and hence the GLRT is inconclusive. Am I making a mistake, or is there another way of constructing a detection test here?
2026-03-26 01:01:12.1774486872
GLRT Inconclusive for Gaussian Detection
60 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in HYPOTHESIS-TESTING
- Neyman-Pearson precision problem
- Rejecting null based on the likelihood ratio test
- What statistical test should I use?
- Should We Use a Paired or Two-Sample Test?
- How to prove inadmissibility of a decision rule?
- Statistics Hypothesis Testing of Continuous Variables
- Experimentally proving bias
- Hypothesis testing: mean comparison
- uniformly most powerful test: binomial distribution
- Can significance check be applied and which one?
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
While I'm not quite sure of the exact model you have in mind, I found strange that you say that the test is inconclusive, because—although asymptotic—the statistic has a well defined distribution: we have $$-2\log \lambda\xrightarrow{\;\mathcal{D}\;}\chi^2_r,$$ where $r$ is the difference between the number of free parameters in $H_1$ and $H_0$.
So you will always have a conclusion, be it rejecting $H_0$ or not.
But it's looking at that distribution that I saw the problem. If $\sigma^2_n$ is unknown and $\sigma^2_s$ is known, then you have one free parameter in both $H_0$ and $H_1$ with leaves you with $r=0$, that is, the GLRT does not apply. Might it be the case that it is the opposite case? Or maybe are both unknown parameters?