I have been told that {0, 2, 4, 6, 8} is a subgroup of the multiplicative integer mod 10. I know that the operation is multiplication, so I understand that every element has its inverse within the set, with respect to the operation. However, the part that i do not understand is why it is labeled as a subgroup when the identity of the multiplicative operation (1) is not in the set. Your help would be very much appreciated.
Groups and subgroups
177 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail AtThere are 2 best solutions below
On
As @amWhy pointed out, 0 has no multiplicative inverse, so under multiplication this set under multiplication isn't a group at all. There would be a similar problem with trying to call this set a subgroup of the multiplicative integers mod 10: if "the multiplicative integers mod 10" means $\mathbb{Z}/10 \mathbb{Z}$ under multiplication, then it isn't a group, and hence can't have subgroups. If "the multiplicative integers mod 10" means the elements of $\mathbb{Z} / 10 \mathbb{Z}$ that are invertible under multiplication, then this is a group, but $S := \{0,2,4,6,8\}$ isn't even a subset of this group.
One thing to notice is that 6 is actually a multiplicative identity for $S$, so $S$ is a ring with 1. This is an example of the at-first surprising fact that if $R$ is a ring with 1 and $S \subseteq R$ that does not contain $1_R$, it is still possible for $S$ to be a ring with $1$, and in fact $1_S$ may even be a zero-divisor in $R$ (in this case $R = \mathbb{Z} / 10 \mathbb{Z}$).
Your set is a subgroup of the additive group of integers modulo $10$, namely $\langle 2\rangle \lt \langle \mathbb Z, +\rangle$, but is not a subgroup of the multiplicative group of integers modulo $10$, because, as you state, the multiplicative identity $1$ is not listed, and because $0$ has no multiplicative inverse.