How can I see this special case of tensor definition as a definition of vectors(quantities with both magnitude and direction)in $\mathbb R^3$?[Edited]

score 61 · Answer 15 · 2026-03-25 03:18:01

61

Views

How does $k!$ come out from the proof?

Published on 25 Mar 2026 - 3:18

List Question

Why is partial derivative of tensor not a tensor?

Implication of the Symmetry of the Christoffel Symbol

Is tensor always a scalar valued multi linear map?

Why does the definition of tensor as multilinear map always use the same vector space and its dual space?

Deformation gradient of 2D manifold immersed in a 3D space

Reason for defining a vector as a $(1,0)$ tensor

Show that $\mathcal{T}_{(r,s)} \cong {\frak{M}}_{(r,s)}$.

Expressing conversion of a $(1,1)$ tensor to a $(2,0)$ tensor in terms of matrices

Directional derivative, gradient and metric

A basis for an alterned tensor

Tangential component of Ricci tensor to a manifold

Gauss-Codazzi equation - Riemann tensor on a manifold $M$

It is correct to say that a tensor is simply a multidimensional array of related quantities? But what about a tensor as a transformation?

How can I see this special case of tensor definition as a definition of vectors(quantities with both magnitude and direction)in $\mathbb R^3$?[Edited]

How does $k!$ come out from the proof?

Trending Questions

Popular # Hahtags

Popular Questions