I don't understand the following points 1) why is $E$ isomorphic to the $\ker(\phi - 1)$? 2) Why is $\#\ker(\phi - 1) = \deg(\phi - 1)$? The proof is taken from here page 11 https://www.math.washington.edu/~morrow/336_09/papers/Igor.pdf
2026-04-05 17:10:52.1775409052
Hasse theorem proof
280 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in ABSTRACT-ALGEBRA
- Feel lost in the scheme of the reducibility of polynomials over $\Bbb Z$ or $\Bbb Q$
- Integral Domain and Degree of Polynomials in $R[X]$
- Fixed points of automorphisms of $\mathbb{Q}(\zeta)$
- Group with order $pq$ has subgroups of order $p$ and $q$
- A commutative ring is prime if and only if it is a domain.
- Conjugacy class formula
- Find gcd and invertible elements of a ring.
- Extending a linear action to monomials of higher degree
- polynomial remainder theorem proof, is it legit?
- $(2,1+\sqrt{-5}) \not \cong \mathbb{Z}[\sqrt{-5}]$ as $\mathbb{Z}[\sqrt{-5}]$-module
Related Questions in ELLIPTIC-CURVES
- Can we find $n$ Pythagorean triples with a common leg for any $n$?
- Solution of $X^5=5 Y (Y+1)+1$ in integers.
- Why does birational equivalence preserve group law in elliptic curves?
- CM elliptic curves and isogeny
- Elliptic Curve and Differential Form Determine Weierstrass Equation
- Difficulty understanding Hartshorne Theorem IV.4.11
- Elementary Elliptic Curves
- Flex points are invariant under isomorphism
- The Mordell equation $x^2 + 11 = y^3$.
- How do we know that reducing $E/K$ commutes with the addition law for $K$ local field
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?

By Fermat's little theorem, $x^p \equiv x \mod{p}$ so in particular $\mathbb{F}_p$ is the fixed field of $\overline{\mathbb{F}_p}$ fixedby the Frobenius automorphism, so a point $(x,y)$ of $E$ is defined over $\mathbb{F}_p$ if and only if both of its coordinates are.
This is the same as saying that their image under the Frobenius map $\phi$ is fixed and therefore $\phi(P)=P$, which is equivalent to $(\phi -1)(P)=0$. This shows we have a bijection of finite sets, and since the kernel is naturally a subgroup, it must be the whole group and hence this is the isomorphism.
The second part is due to the fact that for separable endomorphisms, the size of the kernel equals the degree of the map (for inseparable endomorphisms, we have to take the separable degree). In general, $m\phi+n$ is separable if and only if $p$ doesn't divide $n$.
In your case, $m=n=1$ so this map is separable, and therefore its degree equals the size of its kernel.
Edit: Definition of degree
Let $E$ be given by the equation $y^2=x^3+Ax+B$. Then an endomorphism $\phi:E \rightarrow E$ can be written in the unique form $\phi(x,y)=(f_1(x),f_2(x)y)$ where $f_1,f_2 \in \mathbb{F}_p(x)$.
This means we can write $f_1$ as the quotient of two polynomials, i.e. $f_1(x)=r(x)/s(x)$ where $r,s \in \mathbb{F}_p[x]$ are polynomials. We can then just define the degree of $\phi$ to be $\max \{\deg(r),\deg(s) \}$, unless $\phi$ is just the zero map in which case we define the degree to be zero.
This is the easiest definition, although it seems rather random. The proper way to define it is as the degree of the function field extension $\mathbb{F}_p(E)/\phi^*(\mathbb{F}_p(E))$, which is more useful for theory but slightly more abstract.