Could some help me understand how $\mathbb{R^{n}} - \{x\}$ is homeomorphic to $S^{n-1} \times \mathbb{R}$.
Also, if the one point set is replaced by any finite set, how does the argument work.
This is in Hatcher's book, example 1.15, p.35, where he states this as a fact. I could not find an explanation either before or in the example.
Thank you.
It is helpful to break the argument down into two steps. First, show that $\mathbb{R}$ is homeomorphic to $\mathbb{R}_{>0}$, the latter denoting the positive real numbers.
Then show that $\mathbb{R}^n \setminus \{x\}$ is homeomorphic to $S^{n-1} \times \mathbb{R}_{> 0}$. For notational convenience, I will assume that $x = (0,0,\dots,0)$, as it is straightforward to modify the argument for any $x$ (or simply show that $\mathbb{R}^n \setminus \{x\}$ is homeomorphic to $\mathbb{R}^n \setminus \{(0,0,\dots,0)\}$).
The main idea is to think of $S^{n-1}$ as the unit sphere in $\mathbb{R}^n$ and the $\mathbb{R}_{>0}$ as a scaling factor. So I claim that the map $$ f : S^{n-1} \times \mathbb{R}_{> 0} \rightarrow \mathbb{R}^n \setminus \{(0,0,\dots,0)\} $$ given by $f(\vec{x}, c) = c \vec{x}$ is a continuous map, with a continuous inverse. The details are left to you.