Null hypothesis: $p=60 $% Alternative hypothesis: $p>60$%
$5$% level of significance
proportion = $\frac{382}{500} = 0.764$
$n=500$
The equation I used to find my Z-test statistic is
$$z = \dfrac{\text{proportion} - p}{ \text{standard deviation}}$$
so : $\text{standard deviation} = \sqrt{\frac{p(1-p)}{n}} = \sqrt{\frac{0.6(1-0.6)}{500}} = 0.0219$
then $z= \frac{0.764-0.6}{0.0219} = 7.49$
I know there is something wrong with my Z-test statistic because I need to use my Z-test statistic to find the $p$-value. Would someone please let me know what I am doing wrong?
As @Clarinetist says, you have done this correctly. Here is some additional information.
Your observed 76.4% seems much larger than the hypothetical 60%.
Reality check: A very rough rule of thumb for a 2-sided confidence interval is the observed percentage $\pm 1/\sqrt{n}$. For $n = 500,$ that's about $\pm 4.5\%,$ so a true value of 60% seems far from believable. This rough rule is often used to give margins of sampling error for public opinion polls. (Maybe you've seen $\pm 3\%$ as the margin of error for a poll with about 1100 subjects.)
Your P-value will be far beyond the values in a printed normal table and so essentially 0 (strong evidence for rejecting $H_0; p = 0.6$ against $H_a: p > 0.6$). In R statistical software, the P-value of your one-sided test using the normal approximation can be found as shown below. The last value given (based on your computations) is harmlessly a little different because of rounding error:
An exact P-value can be obtained from the binomial distribution (without using the normal approximation).