Let $A$ be a weak operator closed $^*$-subalgebra of the bounded operators of a Hilbert space. If $T \in A$, then I am trying to show that $P_{(\ker T)^\perp} \in A$(projection for $(\ker T)^\perp$. I have noticed that from polar decomposition the unique partial isometry $U$ satisfies $U^*U = P_{(\ker T)^\perp}$. I am not so sure how to proceed. Would using borel or continuous functional calculus do anything?
2026-03-29 03:35:36.1774755336
help showing a property for a weak operator closed $^*$-subalgebra of the bounded operators of a Hilbert space.
54 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in FUNCTIONAL-ANALYSIS
- On sufficient condition for pre-compactness "in measure"(i.e. in Young measure space)
- Why is necessary ask $F$ to be infinite in order to obtain: $ f(v)=0$ for all $ f\in V^* \implies v=0 $
- Prove or disprove the following inequality
- Unbounded linear operator, projection from graph not open
- $\| (I-T)^{-1}|_{\ker(I-T)^\perp} \| \geq 1$ for all compact operator $T$ in an infinite dimensional Hilbert space
- Elementary question on continuity and locally square integrability of a function
- Bijection between $\Delta(A)$ and $\mathrm{Max}(A)$
- Exercise 1.105 of Megginson's "An Introduction to Banach Space Theory"
- Reference request for a lemma on the expected value of Hermitian polynomials of Gaussian random variables.
- If $A$ generates the $C_0$-semigroup $\{T_t;t\ge0\}$, then $Au=f \Rightarrow u=-\int_0^\infty T_t f dt$?
Related Questions in OPERATOR-THEORY
- $\| (I-T)^{-1}|_{\ker(I-T)^\perp} \| \geq 1$ for all compact operator $T$ in an infinite dimensional Hilbert space
- Confusion about relationship between operator $K$-theory and topological $K$-theory
- Definition of matrix valued smooth function
- hyponormal operators
- a positive matrix of operators
- If $S=(S_1,S_2)$ hyponormal, why $S_1$ and $S_2$ are hyponormal?
- Closed kernel of a operator.
- Why is $\lambda\mapsto(\lambda\textbf{1}-T)^{-1}$ analytic on $\rho(T)$?
- Show that a sequence of operators converges strongly to $I$ but not by norm.
- Is the dot product a symmetric or anti-symmetric operator?
Related Questions in HILBERT-SPACES
- $\| (I-T)^{-1}|_{\ker(I-T)^\perp} \| \geq 1$ for all compact operator $T$ in an infinite dimensional Hilbert space
- hyponormal operators
- a positive matrix of operators
- If $S=(S_1,S_2)$ hyponormal, why $S_1$ and $S_2$ are hyponormal?
- Is the cartesian product of two Hilbert spaces a Hilbert space?
- Show that $ Tf $ is continuous and measurable on a Hilbert space $H=L_2((0,\infty))$
- Kernel functions for vectors in discrete spaces
- The space $D(A^\infty)$
- Show that $Tf$ is well-defined and is continious
- construction of a sequence in a complex Hilbert space which fulfills some specific properties
Related Questions in VON-NEUMANN-ALGEBRAS
- An embedding from the $C(X) \rtimes_{\alpha,r}\Gamma$ into $L^{\infty}(X) \ltimes \Gamma$.
- Are atomic simple C*-algebras von Neumann algebras?
- weak operator topology convergence and the trace of spectral projections
- Reference request for the following theorem in Von Neumann algebras.
- Is the bidual of a C*-algebra isomorphic to the universal enveloping von Nemann algebra as a Banach algebra?
- von Neumann algebra
- L2 norm convergence on (bounded ball of) *-subalgebra of von Neumann algebra
- Traces on $K(H)$
- Why is $M_n(A)$ a von Neumann algebra
- Clarification on proof in Murphy's C*-algebras
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
As mentioned by David, there is a rather direct argument using Borel functional calculus. But the result can be proven with only the Double Commutant Theorem.
You have $T=U|T|$ from the polar decomposition. You also have $|T|\in A$. Let $S\in A'$. For any $x\in H$ we have $$ SU|T|x=STx=TSx=U|T|Sx=US|T|x. $$ The above shows that $SU=US$ on $\def\ran{\operatorname{ran}}$ $\ran |T|$. Since $S|T|=|T|S$, $S(\ran |T|)\subset\ran|T|$. As $S^*\in A'$, if $y\in(\ran |T|)^\perp$, $$ \langle Sy,|T|x\rangle=\langle y,S^*|T|x\rangle=\langle y,|T|S^*x\rangle=0. $$ So $Sy\in(\ran |T|)^\perp=\ker |T|$. Then $SUy=0$ and $SUy=0$. So $US=SU$ also on $(\ran |T|)^\perp$ and so $SU=US$. This means that $U\in A''=A$.