I was recently asked to prove that $\mathbb{Z}[X]/(X^2 - 3) \cong \mathbb{Z}[\sqrt{3}] := \{a + \sqrt{3}b\ | a,b \in \mathbb{Z}\}$. I couldn't do it in a limited amount of time, so I received a sketch of the proof but I'm not sure I understand every step. Here they are:
First of all we consider the map $\phi : \mathbb{Z} \to \mathbb{Z}[\sqrt{3}]$ sending $a$ to a $a +0 \sqrt{3}$ and $X$ to $\sqrt{3}$. Then we know by the universal properties of polynomial rings that $\phi$ is a morphism of rings, and it's the only one such that the following diagram commutes:
$\mathbb{Z} \overset{\phi}{\to} \mathbb{Z}[\sqrt{3}]$ ; $\mathbb{Z} \overset{(*)}{\to} \mathbb{Z}[X]$ and $\mathbb{Z}[X] \overset{\xi}{\to} \mathbb{Z}[\sqrt{3}]$
Then in the same way, according to the universal property of quotients, we can construct a map, say $\psi$, such that the following diagram commutes:
$\mathbb{Z}[X] \overset{\xi}{\to} \mathbb{Z}[\sqrt{3}]$ ; $\mathbb{Z}[X] \overset{\pi}{\to} \mathbb{Z}[X]/\ker(\xi)$ and $\mathbb{Z}[X]/\ker(\xi) \overset{\psi}{\to} \mathbb{Z}[\sqrt{3}]$ where $\pi$ refers to the canonical projection.
Apparently all that was left to show was that $(X^2 - 3) \subseteq \ker(\xi)$ and $im(\xi) = \mathbb{Z}[\sqrt{3}]$.
The major points I didn't get in this proof were:
- the definition of our first map $\phi$, I mean why do we send $a$ to $a + 0\sqrt{3}$?
- which map corresponds to (*)?
- how to show that $(X^2 - 3) \subseteq \ker(\xi)$: I would consider $P \in (X^2 - 3)$ and try to show that it also lives in $\ker(\xi)$, however such $P$ would be of the form $Q(X^2 - 3)$ with $Q \in \mathbb{Z}$, but I don't really get anywhere
- why we need to show that $im(\xi) = \mathbb{Z}[\sqrt{3}]$: indeed this means that we need $\xi$ surjective and I don't see why this is necessary (and I didn't find out how to prove it either)
I believe what I ask is not too difficult, but it would really help me to understand each and every step of this proof, in order to be able to do it again myself.
If there's anything useful I forgot to mention for a good understand of this post don't hesitate to tell me.
And by the way, if you want to give me similar isomorphisms of rings so I can get used to those universal properties, don't hesitate either!
Thanks in advance
A few additional notes