We know the Hilbert transform is defined as: $$ y(t)=\mathcal{H}(x(t))=\operatorname{P.V.}\ \left\{x(t)*\frac{1}{\pi t}\right\} $$ In the frequency domain this is equivalent to: $$ Y(f)=X(f)\times (-j\operatorname{sgn}(f)) $$ Using this twice, we get : $$ Z(f)=Y(f)(-j\operatorname{sgn}(f))=X(f)(-j\operatorname{sgn}(f))^2=-X(f)\operatorname{sgn}^2(f) $$ Many textbooks say $$\operatorname{sgn}^2(f)=1 $$ So $$Z(f)=-X(f) $$ and thus $$\hat{\hat{x}}(t)=-x(t)$$ But in my mind,$$ \operatorname{sgn}(f)|_{f=0}=0$$ and if$$X(0)\neq0,$$ $$Z(0)\neq-X(0)$$ So there is a single point where $$Z(f)\neq X(f).$$ Does this matter? Or Hilbert transform is defined in almost everywhere sense?
2026-03-26 19:03:49.1774551829
Hilbert transform pair
139 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in SIGNAL-PROCESSING
- What is the result of $x(at) * δ(t-k)$
- How is $\int_{-T_0/2}^{+T_0/2} \delta(t) \cos(n\omega_0 t)dt=1$ and $\int_{-T_0/2}^{+T_0/2} \delta(t) \sin(n\omega_0 t)=0$?
- Show that a periodic function $f(t)$ with period $T$ can be written as $ f(t) = f_T (t) \star \frac{1}{T} \text{comb}\bigg(\frac{t}{T}\bigg) $
- Taking the Discrete Inverse Fourier Transform of a Continuous Forward Transform
- Is $x(t) = \sin(3t) + \cos\left({2\over3}t\right) + \cos(\pi t)$ periodic?
- Fast moving object, how to remove noise from observations?
- Computing convolution using the Fourier transform
- Find Fourier Transform of $\cos^2(ωt)x(t)$
- Finding closed expression for the output of an LTI system
- Is there an intuitive way to see that $\mathbb{E}[X|Y]$ is the least squares estimator of $X$ given $Y$?
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
Any time you speak of integral operators, equality is almost always (hah) meant in the sense of almost everywhere. This makes sense since integrals don't see points; so as long as two functions only differ on some "small" set (of measure zero), we should expect to get the same output regardless.
As a note for future posts: sometimes in-line math is a good thing. Not every line of LaTeX code needs to be in an equation environment.