When you want to show a function is holomorphic on a set $U$ it suffices to show that it is holomorphic on any disc in $U$.
1) Why is this true?
Also I was doing a problem to show the uniform limit of a sequence of holomorphic functions was also holomorphic in the set. This involved using Morera's Thm.
The next part of the problem was to show the sum from $r=0$ to $r=\infty$ of $\frac{1}{(r-z)^2} $ was a holomorphic. Using the previous part if you show it converges uniformly in ($\mathbb{C}$ set difference $\mathbb{N}$) you are done In order to do this, one of the hints was the following: " The series does not converge (UNIFORMLY) on the whole of ($\mathbb{C}$ set difference $\mathbb{N}$) but for any $z$ in ($\mathbb{C}$ set difference $\mathbb{N}$) convergence is uniform on some neighbourhood of $z$.
2) How can something converge uniformly on every disc in the set but not on the whole thing?
I would appreciate answers to $1)$ and $2)$