I know that the general form of orthogonal matrices is $$\begin{pmatrix} \cos \theta & \sin \theta \\ -\sin \theta & \cos \theta \end{pmatrix}$$ since they are all rotation matrices but how do I prove it? I have done the reverse, i.e., for such a rotation matrix proven that it is orthogonal: $$\vec r^\prime . \vec r^\prime = \sum_{p=1}^n r_p r_p = \sum_{p=1}^n (\sum_{j=1}^n R_{pj} r_j) (\sum_{k=1}^n R_{pk} r_k) = \sum_{pjk} R_{pj} R_{pk} r_j r_k = \sum_{i} r_i r_i = \vec r . \vec r$$ which is only possible if $\sum_{p} R_{pj} R_{pk}$ = $\delta_{jk}$ which defines an orthogonal matrix. Does just reversing this process work for finding the general form? If not, what's the correct method?
2026-03-25 22:04:23.1774476263
How can I find the general form of an orthogonal matrix?
2.7k Views Asked by user573957 https://math.techqa.club/user/user573957/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in LINEAR-ALGEBRA
- An underdetermined system derived for rotated coordinate system
- How to prove the following equality with matrix norm?
- Alternate basis for a subspace of $\mathcal P_3(\mathbb R)$?
- Why the derivative of $T(\gamma(s))$ is $T$ if this composition is not a linear transformation?
- Why is necessary ask $F$ to be infinite in order to obtain: $ f(v)=0$ for all $ f\in V^* \implies v=0 $
- I don't understand this $\left(\left[T\right]^B_C\right)^{-1}=\left[T^{-1}\right]^C_B$
- Summation in subsets
- $C=AB-BA$. If $CA=AC$, then $C$ is not invertible.
- Basis of span in $R^4$
- Prove if A is regular skew symmetric, I+A is regular (with obstacles)
Related Questions in MATRICES
- How to prove the following equality with matrix norm?
- I don't understand this $\left(\left[T\right]^B_C\right)^{-1}=\left[T^{-1}\right]^C_B$
- Powers of a simple matrix and Catalan numbers
- Gradient of Cost Function To Find Matrix Factorization
- Particular commutator matrix is strictly lower triangular, or at least annihilates last base vector
- Inverse of a triangular-by-block $3 \times 3$ matrix
- Form square matrix out of a non square matrix to calculate determinant
- Extending a linear action to monomials of higher degree
- Eiegenspectrum on subtracting a diagonal matrix
- For a $G$ a finite subgroup of $\mathbb{GL}_2(\mathbb{R})$ of rank $3$, show that $f^2 = \textrm{Id}$ for all $f \in G$
Related Questions in ORTHOGONAL-MATRICES
- Minimum of the 2-norm
- Optimization over images of column-orthogonal matrices through rotations and reflections
- Functions on $\mathbb{R}^n$ commuting with orthogonal transformations
- A property of orthogonal matrices
- Rotating a matrix to become symmetric
- Question involving orthogonal matrix and congruent matrices $P^{t}AP=I$
- Finding An Orthogonal Transformation Matrix
- Which statement is false ?(Linear algebra problem)
- Every hyperplane contains an orthogonal matrix
- Show non-singularity of orthogonal matrix
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
Actually, this is not the general form. It's the general form of the $2\times2$ orthogonal matrices with determinant $1$; there are also those with determinant $-1$.
Anyway, what you're after are those matrices $\left[\begin{smallmatrix}a&b\\c&d\end{smallmatrix}\right]$ such that $\left[\begin{smallmatrix}a&c\\b&d\end{smallmatrix}\right]\left[\begin{smallmatrix}a&b\\c&d\end{smallmatrix}\right]=\left[\begin{smallmatrix}1&0\\0&1\end{smallmatrix}\right]$. But this means that$$\left\{\begin{array}{l}a^2+b^2=1\\c^2+d^2=1\\ab+cd=0\end{array}\right.$$The first two equations mean that $(a,b)$ and $(c,d)$ have norm $1$, whereas the third one means that $(a,b)$ and $(c,d)$ are orthogonal. Since $\bigl\|(a,b)\bigr\|=1$, $(a,b)=(\cos\theta,\sin\theta)$, for some $\theta$. And, since $(c,d)$ is orthogonal to $(a,b)$ and since it also has norm $1$, it is equal to $\pm(-\sin\theta,\cos\theta)$. Therefore, the general form is$$\begin{bmatrix}\cos\theta&\mp\sin\theta\\\sin\theta&\pm\cos\theta\end{bmatrix}.$$Replacing $\theta$ by $-\theta$, one gets the form that you mentioned.