So I was told that I have a $5\times 5$ matrix and one eigenvalue is $2$-dimensional and the second eigenvalue is $3$-dimensional and I have to explain if it's diagonalizable or not. I know that it is, since the dimensions of the 2 eigenspaces add up to 5, but I'm unsure of how I should explain in my response that it's the correct answer. It doesn't need to be a formal or anything this is an introductory linear algebra class. I want to say "Yes because the dimensions of the eigenspaces will fill $\mathbb R^5$." But I'm not sure if that makes sense. I would say that as my ansewr becasue my TA said something similar.
2026-04-03 07:33:49.1775201629
How do I explain this in a correct way?
60 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in LINEAR-ALGEBRA
- An underdetermined system derived for rotated coordinate system
- How to prove the following equality with matrix norm?
- Alternate basis for a subspace of $\mathcal P_3(\mathbb R)$?
- Why the derivative of $T(\gamma(s))$ is $T$ if this composition is not a linear transformation?
- Why is necessary ask $F$ to be infinite in order to obtain: $ f(v)=0$ for all $ f\in V^* \implies v=0 $
- I don't understand this $\left(\left[T\right]^B_C\right)^{-1}=\left[T^{-1}\right]^C_B$
- Summation in subsets
- $C=AB-BA$. If $CA=AC$, then $C$ is not invertible.
- Basis of span in $R^4$
- Prove if A is regular skew symmetric, I+A is regular (with obstacles)
Related Questions in MATRICES
- How to prove the following equality with matrix norm?
- I don't understand this $\left(\left[T\right]^B_C\right)^{-1}=\left[T^{-1}\right]^C_B$
- Powers of a simple matrix and Catalan numbers
- Gradient of Cost Function To Find Matrix Factorization
- Particular commutator matrix is strictly lower triangular, or at least annihilates last base vector
- Inverse of a triangular-by-block $3 \times 3$ matrix
- Form square matrix out of a non square matrix to calculate determinant
- Extending a linear action to monomials of higher degree
- Eiegenspectrum on subtracting a diagonal matrix
- For a $G$ a finite subgroup of $\mathbb{GL}_2(\mathbb{R})$ of rank $3$, show that $f^2 = \textrm{Id}$ for all $f \in G$
Related Questions in DIAGONALIZATION
- Determining a $4\times4$ matrix knowing $3$ of its $4$ eigenvectors and eigenvalues
- Show that $A^m=I_n$ is diagonalizable
- Simultaneous diagonalization on more than two matrices
- Diagonalization and change of basis
- Is this $3 \times 3$ matrix diagonalizable?
- Matrix $A\in \mathbb{R}^{4\times4}$ has eigenvectors $\bf{u_1,u_2,u_3,u_4}$ satisfying $\bf{Au_1=5u_1,Au_2=9u_2}$ & $\bf{Au_3=20u_3}$. Find $A\bf{w}$.
- Block diagonalizing a Hermitian matrix
- undiagonizable matrix and annhilating polynom claims
- Show that if $\lambda$ is an eigenvalue of matrix $A$ and $B$, then it is an eigenvalue of $B^{-1}AB$
- Is a complex symmetric square matrix with zero diagonal diagonalizable?
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
You can just say that the matrix is diagonalisable because the set of eigenvectors span $\mathbb{R}^5$.
Let $A$ denote your matrix, $\lambda_1,\lambda_2$ denote the two eigenvectors, $v_1,v_2$ ($v_3,v_4,v_5$) denote the eigenvectors corresponding to $\lambda_1$ ($\lambda_2$), $V$ be the matrix of eigenvectors and $\Lambda$ that of eigenvalues.
The above is important because it allows us to express any vector $x\in\mathbb{R}^5$ as a linear combination of the eigenvectors:
$$x=c_1v_1+c_2v_2+\dots+c_5v_5.$$
Re-arranging the above we have that $x=Vc\Leftrightarrow c=V^{-1}x$. Thus,
$$Ax=A(c_1v_1+c_2v_2+\dots+c_5v_5)=\lambda_1c_1v_1+\lambda_1c_2v_2+\dots+\lambda_2c_5v_5=V\Lambda c=V\Lambda V^{-1}x.$$
Since the above holds for all $x\in\mathbb{R}^5$ we have that $A=V\Lambda V^{-1}$.