I want to simplify :
$\lfloor (3x_1+1)/2 \rfloor $ = $\lfloor (3x_2+1)/2 \rfloor $
to
$x_1=x_2$
Can I just take off the floor of both sides? Would that be justified by the definition of floor? Not sure how to get rid of the floor. Thanks!
I want to simplify :
$\lfloor (3x_1+1)/2 \rfloor $ = $\lfloor (3x_2+1)/2 \rfloor $
to
$x_1=x_2$
Can I just take off the floor of both sides? Would that be justified by the definition of floor? Not sure how to get rid of the floor. Thanks!
On
Your equation means that $$\exists k\in \Bbb Z \;:$$
$$k\le \frac{3x_1+1}{2} <k+1$$ and $$k\le \frac {3x_2+1}{2}<k+1$$
or $$(x_1,x_2)\in \left[\frac {2k-1}{3},\frac {2k+1}{3}\right)^2$$
we don't have necessarily $x_1=x_2$.
On
$$\lfloor (3x_1+1)/2 \rfloor = \lfloor (3x_2+1)/2 \rfloor = M$$ implies that $(3x_1+1)/2 = M+a$ and $(3x_2+1)/2 = M+b$ where $a,b \in (0,1)$. In other words, you can conclude that $$ -1 \le \frac{3x_1+1}{2} - \frac{3x_2+1}{2} \le 1 $$ which implies $$ -2 \le 3(x_1-x_2) \le 2 $$ so $$ \left| x_1 - x_2 \right| < \frac{2}{3} $$
Bad news: $\lfloor \cdot \rfloor$ is not an injective map (as $1.2 \neq 1.3$ but $\lfloor 1.2\rfloor = \lfloor 1.3\rfloor =1$ shows). This means you cannot just remove floor in both sides.
This reasoning provides a counter example for what you're trying to prove. Take $x_1 = 1$ and $x_2 = 1.1$. Then $$\left\lfloor 2 \right\rfloor = \left\lfloor 2.15\right\rfloor =2.$$