Simple 6-dimensional bivectors in $\mathbb{R^4}$ are restricted to a 3D subspace by $B\wedge B=0$. They generate simple rotations in 4D. Intuitively I'm failing to completely understand how a bivector restricted to 3D (with the information of a spatial vector axis? ) can generate a rotation that preserves the orientation of a plane on a simple rotation in 4D, so there must be something that I'm missing or misconstruing here.Wouldn't it be required that such bivectors had access to the 6 planes of rotation in 4D? I mean, how a bivector with the info of a spatial vector is enough to characterize a rotation in 4D when it usually does so just in 3D?
2026-03-27 13:20:14.1774617614
How do simple bivectors in $\mathbb{R^4}$ generate rotations?
316 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in LINEAR-ALGEBRA
- An underdetermined system derived for rotated coordinate system
- How to prove the following equality with matrix norm?
- Alternate basis for a subspace of $\mathcal P_3(\mathbb R)$?
- Why the derivative of $T(\gamma(s))$ is $T$ if this composition is not a linear transformation?
- Why is necessary ask $F$ to be infinite in order to obtain: $ f(v)=0$ for all $ f\in V^* \implies v=0 $
- I don't understand this $\left(\left[T\right]^B_C\right)^{-1}=\left[T^{-1}\right]^C_B$
- Summation in subsets
- $C=AB-BA$. If $CA=AC$, then $C$ is not invertible.
- Basis of span in $R^4$
- Prove if A is regular skew symmetric, I+A is regular (with obstacles)
Related Questions in RIEMANNIAN-GEOMETRY
- What is the correct formula for the Ricci curvature of a warped manifold?
- How to show that extension of linear connection commutes with contraction.
- geodesic of infinite length without self-intersections
- Levi-Civita-connection of an embedded submanifold is induced by the orthogonal projection of the Levi-Civita-connection of the original manifold
- Geodesically convex neighborhoods
- The induced Riemannian metric is not smooth on the diagonal
- Intrinsic vs. Extrinsic notions of Harmonic maps.
- Equivalence of different "balls" in Riemannian manifold.
- Why is the index of a harmonic map finite?
- A closed manifold of negative Ricci curvature has no conformal vector fields
Related Questions in LIE-ALGEBRAS
- Holonomy bundle is a covering space
- Computing the logarithm of an exponentiated matrix?
- Need help with notation. Is this lower dot an operation?
- On uniparametric subgroups of a Lie group
- Are there special advantages in this representation of sl2?
- $SU(2)$ adjoint and fundamental transformations
- Radical of Der(L) where L is a Lie Algebra
- $SU(3)$ irreps decomposition in subgroup irreps
- Given a representation $\phi: L \rightarrow \mathfrak {gl}(V)$ $\phi(L)$ in End $V$ leaves invariant precisely the same subspaces as $L$.
- Tensors transformations under $so(4)$
Related Questions in EXTERIOR-ALGEBRA
- Does curl vector influence the final destination of a particle?
- How to get the missing brick of the proof $A \circ P_\sigma = P_\sigma \circ A$ using permutations?
- Is the exterior/wedge product of differential forms injective?
- trace of exterior product of a skew matrix $M$, $\bigwedge^kM$
- Question about notation in differential forms.
- A confusing formula in Clifford algebra
- Is there a non-degenerate solution for this PDE on $\mathbb{R}^3$?
- Using the 'wedge product'
- Does every connection admit a parallel volume form?
- Derivation of Green's theorem - I have wrong negative sign
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
$ \newcommand\Ext{\mathop{\textstyle\bigwedge}} \newcommand\MVects[1]{\mathop{\textstyle\bigwedge^{\mkern-1mu#1}}} \newcommand\Cl[1]{\mathrm{Cl_{#1}}(\mathbb R)} \newcommand\ClE[1]{\mathrm{Cl}^+_{#1}(\mathbb R)} $For a fixed bivector $B$, the condition $B\wedge B = 0$ means that $B$ lives in some 3D subspace. It does not mean that all bivectors live in the same 3D subspace.
To be precise, let $V$ be the vector space in question. For every subspace $W \subseteq V$ we can naturally identify $\Ext W$ as a subspace of $\Ext V$. The statement is:
This is not the same as the following statement (which is false):
Some of these bivectors are "spatial vectors", just not all of them and not for all observers.
Space-time can be studied through the Clifford algebra $\Cl{1,3}$ which is naturally isomorphic to the exterior algebra as a vector space. It's even subalgebra $\ClE{1,3}$ (the subalgebra of all sums of products of an even number of 4-vectors) is isomorphic to $\Cl3$, the algebra of 3D Euclidean space. A choice of such an isomorphism is equivalent to a choice of non-null 4-vector and is called a space-time split.
With the standard basis $\gamma_0, \gamma_1, \gamma_2, \gamma_3$, if we do a space-time split with $\gamma_0$ then the following three bivectors $$ \gamma_0\gamma_1,\quad \gamma_0\gamma_2,\quad \gamma_0\gamma_3 $$ are exactly an orthonormal basis for "spatial vectors" in $\Cl3 \cong \ClE{1,3}$. This space-time split corresponds to an observer whose 4-velocity is $\gamma_0$. They also generate boosts for such an observer. We are left with three other basis bivectors $$ \gamma_2\gamma_3,\quad \gamma_3\gamma_1,\quad \gamma_1\gamma_2. $$ These generate rotations for a $\gamma_0$-observer; you can see that these are in fact "spatial bivectors" with respect to the $\gamma_0$-split since e.g. $$ (\gamma_0\gamma_1)(\gamma_0\gamma_2) = -\gamma_0^2\gamma_1\gamma_2 = -\gamma_1\gamma_2. $$