I'm really having trouble trying to understand this. A few weeks back, I got pretty interested in sphere packing and I'm trying to grasp the idea of using a matrix to represent the basis of a lattice. I've been using lattices like this one $\left(\begin{array}\12 & 0 & 0\\ 1 & \sqrt3 & 0\\1 & \frac{1}{\sqrt3} &\frac{2\sqrt6}{3}\end{array}\right)$ for the fcc lattice, because this represents the three vectors $(2,0,0)$, $(1,\sqrt3,0)$, and $(1,\frac{1}{\sqrt3},\frac{2\sqrt6}{3})$ that make the fundamental parallelipipid for the lattice. I think this lattice is also represented by $A_3$. It says here (archive) that the Gram Matrix of $A_3$ is $\left(\begin{array}\12 & -1 & 0\\-1 & 2 & -1\\0 & -1 & 2\end{array}\right)$. How is the Gram Matrix related to the basis I've been using? What about the basis they give? Is there a fast way to construct a lattice and find its density from a Gram Matrix? Everything I've found so far is over my head.
2026-03-29 14:08:12.1774793292
How do you construct a lattice from its basis or its Gram Matrix?
2.1k Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in MATRICES
- How to prove the following equality with matrix norm?
- I don't understand this $\left(\left[T\right]^B_C\right)^{-1}=\left[T^{-1}\right]^C_B$
- Powers of a simple matrix and Catalan numbers
- Gradient of Cost Function To Find Matrix Factorization
- Particular commutator matrix is strictly lower triangular, or at least annihilates last base vector
- Inverse of a triangular-by-block $3 \times 3$ matrix
- Form square matrix out of a non square matrix to calculate determinant
- Extending a linear action to monomials of higher degree
- Eiegenspectrum on subtracting a diagonal matrix
- For a $G$ a finite subgroup of $\mathbb{GL}_2(\mathbb{R})$ of rank $3$, show that $f^2 = \textrm{Id}$ for all $f \in G$
Related Questions in QUADRATIC-FORMS
- Can we find $n$ Pythagorean triples with a common leg for any $n$?
- Questions on positivity of quadratic form with orthogonal constraints
- How does positive (semi)definiteness help with showing convexity of quadratic forms?
- Equivalence of integral primitive indefinite binary quadratic forms
- Signs of eigenvalues of $3$ by $3$ matrix
- Homogeneous quadratic in $n$ variables has nonzero singular point iff associated symmetric matrix has zero determinant.
- Trace form and totally real number fields
- Let $f(x) = x^\top Q \, x$, where $Q \in \mathbb R^{n×n}$ is NOT symmetric. Show that the Hessian is $H_f (x) = Q + Q^\top$
- Graph of curve defined by $3x^2+3y^2-2xy-2=0$
- Question on quadratic forms of dimension 3
Related Questions in INTEGER-LATTICES
- Number of paths on square lattice without immediate backtracking
- Counting north east lattice paths in a rhomboid
- Visualize ideals in number fields
- When is the Dirichlet region of a lattice a rectangle?
- Lattice vectors and modular arithmetic
- How to define a lattice as an abelian group?
- How to prove that lattice width is attained?
- Can interesting bounds to Gauss circle problem be seen/come from counting points close to a line?
- the intutionistic meaning of the Lovász condition in the LLL algorithm
- Bound for the minimal vector of an indefinite lattice
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
What they actually do on the website, which saves a bunch of square root signs, is to realize the lattice in $\mathbb R^4$ as
$$ \left( \begin{array}{rrrr} 1 & -1 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 1 & -1 & 0\\ 0 & 0 & 1 & -1 \end{array} \right) \cdot \left( \begin{array}{rrr} 1 & 0 & 0 \\ -1 & 1 & 0\\ 0 & -1 & 1 \\ 0 & 0 & -1 \end{array} \right) = \left( \begin{array}{rrr} 2 & -1 & 0 \\ -1 & 2 & -1\\ 0 & -1 & 2 \end{array} \right). $$ Here you are given basis vectors as the three rows of the rectangular matrix on the left, or the columns of the matrix on the right, which is its transpose. That is the fundamental relation, call it $$ B \; B^T = G. $$
For the version you want, squre matrices over the integers are possible: $$ \left( \begin{array}{rrr} 0 & 1 & 1 \\ 1 & 0 & 1 \\ 1 & 1 & 0 \end{array} \right) \cdot \left( \begin{array}{rrr} 0 & 1 & 1 \\ 1 & 0 & 1 \\ 1 & 1 & 0 \end{array} \right) = \left( \begin{array}{rrr} 2 & 1 & 1 \\ 1 & 2 & 1\\ 1 & 1 & 2 \end{array} \right). $$
If you really want, you can write this in lower/upper triangular square matrices. This can be done with CHOLESKY, which can be done by hand here. You should have been using $$ \left( \begin{array}{rrr} \sqrt 2 & 0 & 0 \\ \sqrt{ \frac{1}{2} } & \sqrt{ \frac{3}{2} } & 0 \\ \sqrt{ \frac{1}{2} } & \sqrt{ \frac{1}{6} } & \sqrt{ \frac{4}{3} } \end{array} \right) \cdot \left( \begin{array}{rrr} \sqrt 2 & \sqrt{ \frac{1}{2} } & \sqrt{ \frac{1}{2} } \\ 0 & \sqrt{ \frac{3}{2} } & \sqrt{ \frac{1}{6} } \\ 0 & 0 & \sqrt{ \frac{4}{3} } \end{array} \right) = \left( \begin{array}{rrr} 2 & 1 & 1 \\ 1 & 2 & 1\\ 1 & 1 & 2 \end{array} \right). $$
Finally, the relationship required for distinct gram matrices to represent the same lattice is called "equivalence." If you have gram matrices $G,H,$ equivalence means there is an integer matrix $P$ with $\det P = 1$ such that $$ P G P^T = H. $$ Naturally, if you take $Q = P^{-1}$ you get $$ Q H Q^T = G $$ as well.
Gaze in awe: $$ \left( \begin{array}{rrr} 1 & 0 & 0 \\ -1 & 1 & 0 \\ 0 & -1 & 1 \end{array} \right) \cdot \left( \begin{array}{rrr} 2 & 1 & 1 \\ 1 & 2 & 1\\ 1 & 1 & 2 \end{array} \right) \cdot \left( \begin{array}{rrr} 1 & -1 & 0 \\ 0 & 1 & -1 \\ 0 & 0 & 1 \end{array} \right) = \left( \begin{array}{rrr} 2 & -1 & 0 \\ -1 & 2 & -1\\ 0 & -1 & 2 \end{array} \right). $$