I have found all 16 relations on a two element set. But now I can not find the ones which are not transitive. I dont know how ($xRy \land yRz) \implies xRz$ relates to this conversation.
This should be obvious because some relations in this context have $x,y,z,w$ elements.
Any help would be tremendously appreciated.
It is $\forall x\,\forall y\,\forall z\;\Big(\big(x\mathop Ry\wedge y\mathop Rz\big) \to x\mathop Rz\Big)$.
Transitivity is the claim that if there is some indirect relationship from one entity ($x$) to another entity ($z$), through some bridge ($y$), then there must be a direct relationship.
It's not a matter of finding cases that satisfy this condition, just that no case can be found to falsify it.
Another way to express transitivity is that: $$\neg\,\exists x\,\exists y\,\exists z\;\Big(\big(x\mathop Ry\wedge y\mathop Rz\big)\wedge\neg x\mathop Rz\Big)$$
So if you can find any such indirect relationship but cannot find a corresponding direct relationship, then the entire relation is not transitive.
Only if you can demonstrate that no such counterexample exists can you claim transitivity.