Why does the theorem of Hahn-Banach implies that the dual space is not empty ($X^*\neq\emptyset)$ ?
Is there an important corollary which I've missed ?
Why does the theorem of Hahn-Banach implies that the dual space is not empty ($X^*\neq\emptyset)$ ?
Is there an important corollary which I've missed ?
On
If $X \neq \{0\}$(!), you have some $x \in X$ with $x \neq 0$ which implies that $\|x\| \neq 0$ by definiteness of the norm.
You can define now the functional $\varphi(\alpha x) = \alpha\|x\|$ on $\operatorname{span} x$. Now, $\|\alpha x\| = 1$ iff $|\alpha| = \frac{1}{\|x\|}$. This implies that $$ |\varphi(\alpha x)| = |\alpha \varphi(x)| = 1 $$ for all $\alpha x$ with norm 1. In particular $\varphi$ is continuous with operator norm $\|\varphi\| = 1$ and by Hahn-Banach there exists some extension $\tilde \varphi \in X^*$ with $\tilde \varphi \neq 0$, since $\tilde \varphi(x) = \varphi(x) = \|x\| \neq 0$. Alternatively, you see that $\tilde \varphi \neq 0$ since $\|\tilde \varphi\| = \|\varphi\| = 1 \neq 0$, once again by definiteness of the (operator) norm.
The dual space is always non-empty, as it contains the zero functional. The Hahn-Banach theorem implies that if $X \neq \{0\}$, then also $X^* \neq \{0\}$.
Choose a non-zero vector $a \in X$. Denote the subspace $Y := \mathrm{span} (a) \subseteq X$ and the bounded functional $\varphi \in Y^*$ defined by $\varphi(a) = 1$. By Hahn-Banach, it can be extended to some bounded functional on the whole space $\overline{\varphi} \in X^*$, which is non-zero (since $\overline{\varphi}(a) \neq 0$), hence $X^* \neq \{0\}$.