I see in several books that the gradient of a function (curve), f(x,y) is defined as the normal to the curve without the proof. Can someone prove mathematically that this is true?
2026-03-25 16:00:04.1774454404
How is the gradient of a curve or function its normal
683 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in SURFACES
- Surface by revolution
- A new type of curvature multivector for surfaces?
- Regular surfaces with boundary and $C^1$ domains
- Hyperplane line bundle really defined by some hyperplane
- 2D closed surface such that there's always a straight line to a point?
- parametrized surface are isometric if all corresponding curves have same length
- Klein bottle and torus in mod $p$ homology
- How can I prove that the restricted parametrization of a surface in $\mathbb{R}^{3}$ ia a diffeomorphism?
- A diffeomorphism between a cylinder and a one-sheeted hyperboloid
- Involution of the 3 and 4-holed torus and its effects on some knots and links
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
Gradient of a function, i.e., $\vec{\nabla} f(x)$, is not normal to the curve $f(x)$. It is normal to the contour curve, and tangent to the curve $f(x)$.
Consider a function $z=f(x,y)$ then rewrite it as $f(x(t),y(t)) = c$ with some constant scalar $c$ for each level surface (i.e. a surface with constant value of $f(x,y)$). Then let $\vec{r}(t) = \begin{bmatrix}x(t) & y(t)\end{bmatrix}'$ be a parametric curve on the level surface . Also note that $x=x(t), y=y(t)$ for the general case.
Now we take the derivative
$\dfrac{df}{dt} = \dfrac{\partial f}{\partial x}\dfrac{dx}{dt} + \dfrac{\partial f}{\partial y}\dfrac{dy}{dt} = 0$
$\dfrac{df}{dt} = \begin{bmatrix}\dfrac{\partial f}{\partial x} & \dfrac{\partial f}{\partial y}\end{bmatrix} \begin{bmatrix}\dfrac{dx}{dt} & \dfrac{dy}{dt}\end{bmatrix}' =0$
$\vec{\nabla} f(x,y) \cdot \vec{r}(t) = 0$
Because the inner product of the above two vectors is 0, it implies that $\vec{\nabla} f(x,y) \perp \vec{r}(t)$. Hence the gradient of $f(x,y)$ is perpendicular to the level surface (i.e. the contour line) of $f(x,y)$.
The same proof can be used for the function $f$ in higher dimension.