How many boundary values determine an automorphism of unit disk?

618 Views Asked by At

How many boundary values are needed to uniquely determine an automorphism of unit disk?

More precisely, find the $n \in \mathbb{N} $ such that for any two sets $ \{ x_1, x_2, ..., x_n \} $ and $ \{ y_1, y_2, ..., y_n \} $ of $n$ distinct points on $ \mathbb{S}^1 $, there exists a unique automorphism $ f: \mathbb{D} \rightarrow \mathbb{D} $ with $ f(x_i) = y_i $ for all $i$.

Clearly, $n=2$ is not enough: there are many automorphisms $ \mathbb{D} \rightarrow \mathbb{D} $ fixing the two points $1$ and $-1$ on $ \mathbb{S}^1 $.

My guess is $n=3$, since any automorphism $ \mathbb{D} \rightarrow \mathbb{D} $ is of the form $ f_{e^{i\theta},a} (z) = e^{i\theta} \frac{z-a}{1-\bar{a}z} $, where $ (e^{i\theta},a) \in \mathbb{S}^1 \times \mathbb{D} $. The dimension of the parameter space $ \mathbb{S}^1 \times \mathbb{D} $ suggests that we need three boundary values.

However, when I plug in $ f_{e^{i\theta},a} (x_i) = y_i, $ $ i=1,2,3 $, I can't solve $ (e^{i\theta},a) $ explicitly in terms of $x_i$ and $y_i$. Any suggestion?

2

There are 2 best solutions below

0
On

Your guess based on dimension is correct.

To come up with a proof, it helps to recognize that your formula for an automorphism of the disc generalizes to the concept of a fractional linear transformation $$T(z) = \frac{az+b}{cz+d} $$ where $a,b,c,d \in \mathbb{C}$ and $ad-bc \ne 0$. Furthermore, after a normalization you may assume $ad-bc=1$. Normalized fractional linear transformations form a group under composition; this group is isomorphic to $SL(2,\mathbb{C})$.

Just to put this in context, each normalized fractional linear transformation is an automorphism of the entire Riemann sphere $\mathbb{C} \cup \{\infty\}$, and these are exactly all of the automorphisms of $\mathbb{C} \cup \{\infty\}$, so every automorphism of $\mathbb{D}$ extends to the whole of $\mathbb{C} \cup \{\infty\}$. Thus, if you know something about automorphisms of $\mathbb{C} \cup \{\infty\}$ then perhaps you can apply it to gain knowledge about automorphisms of $\mathbb{D}$.

The uniqueness property you want then follows from a lemma which says that for any two triples of distinct points $z_1,z_2,z_3$ and $w_1,w_2,w_3$ in $\mathbb{C} \cup \{\infty\}$ (assuming the three $z$'s are all different, as are the three $w$'s) there exists a unique normalized fractional linear transformation $T$ such that $w_1 = T(z_1)$, $w_2 = T(z_2)$, $w_3 = T(z_3)$. It is easiest to prove this lemma first in a special case $w_1=0$, $w_2=1$, $w_3=\infty$, and then use that to prove the general case.

0
On

I realize I am perhaps a little late to answer this question, but I was wondering about the same thing and it took me quite some time to figure it out. So I hope other people might find this solution in the future.

I find the question easier to answer in the upper half plane model $\mathbb{H}$. Using for example

$$ \phi\colon \mathbb{D} \rightarrow \mathbb{H}, z \mapsto \frac{z-i}{1-iz} $$

and extending it to $\partial \mathbb{D}$, we see that $\phi(\partial \mathbb{D}) = \mathbb{R} \cup \{\infty\}$ holds.

Furthermore you can check that the automorphism group of $\mathbb{H}$ is given by $\operatorname{PSL}(2,\mathbb{R})$.

What we want to prove next is, that given any two triplebs of boundary points of $\mathbb{H}$ (i.e. $\mathbb{R} \cup \{\infty\}$), we find a unique element in the automorphism group of $\mathbb{H}$ converting the one into the other.

To see that we consider the complex cross-ratio given by

$$ (z; z_1, z_2, z_3) \mapsto \frac{(z - z_2)(z_1 -z_3)}{(z_1 - z_2)(z - z_3)}, $$

where we kill a term, if one of the variables is $\infty$ and the $z_i$ are distinct and fixed. Then we get a Möbius transformation which we denote by $\phi$. We see the following:

$$ \phi(z_1) = 1, \quad \phi(z_2) = 0 \text{ and } \phi(z_3) = \infty. $$

From that we get the following observation: if the $z_i$ are in $\mathbb{R} \cup \infty$, then $\phi$ is represented by a real matrix and we can find a representative in $\operatorname{PSL}(2, \mathbb{R})$. So we can map any $\mathbb{H}$ boundary triple to the triple $(1,0, \infty)$, which is also a $\mathbb{H}$ boundary triple. Concatenation with an inverse of another cross-ratio yields our assertion.

The uniqueness of the tranfsormation is given by the fact, that any Möbius transformation is uniquely determined by three points (which is actually a consequence of the cross-ratio, we used).

Now, going back to $\mathbb{D}$, we get that any automorphism of it, is uniquely determined by three boundary values.