What can be said in general (if we do not assume the continuum hypothesis) about the cardinality of the set of all infinite cardinals smaller than $\aleph$?
2026-04-06 09:55:28.1775469328
how many infinite cardinals are smaller than $\aleph$?
625 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in SET-THEORY
- Theorems in MK would imply theorems in ZFC
- What formula proved in MK or Godel Incompleteness theorem
- Proving the schema of separation from replacement
- Understanding the Axiom of Replacement
- Ordinals and cardinals in ETCS set axiomatic
- Minimal model over forcing iteration
- How can I prove that the collection of all (class-)function from a proper class A to a class B is empty?
- max of limit cardinals smaller than a successor cardinal bigger than $\aleph_\omega$
- Canonical choice of many elements not contained in a set
- Non-standard axioms + ZF and rest of math
Related Questions in CARDINALS
- Ordinals and cardinals in ETCS set axiomatic
- max of limit cardinals smaller than a successor cardinal bigger than $\aleph_\omega$
- If $\kappa$ is a regular cardinal then $\kappa^{<\kappa} = \max\{\kappa, 2^{<\kappa}\}$
- Intuition regarding: $\kappa^{+}=|\{\kappa\leq\alpha\lt \kappa^{+}\}|$
- On finding enough rationals (countable) to fill the uncountable number of intervals between the irrationals.
- Is the set of cardinalities totally ordered?
- Show that $n+\aleph_0=\aleph_0$
- $COF(\lambda)$ is stationary in $k$, where $\lambda < k$ is regular.
- What is the cardinality of a set of all points on a line?
- Better way to define this bijection [0,1) to (0,1)
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
I assume by $\aleph$ you mean the continuum, the size of the reals, which is more commonly denoted $\mathfrak c$ or $2^{\aleph_0}$.
There is no bound, actually. Meaning, it is consistent that $2^{\aleph_0}=\aleph_\kappa=\kappa$ for some (necessarily limit) ordinal $\kappa$, so there are $\kappa$ (that is, continuum many) infinite cardinals below the continuum. Of course, we cannot have more than this. (That is, relative to its size, it can be as large as possible.)
More can be said: If $2^{\aleph_0}=\aleph_\beta$, then either $\beta$ is a successor ordinal, or it is a limit ordinal of cofinality larger than $\omega$. This follows from König's theorem.
Solovay showed, in the very early days of forcing, that in a sense this is all we can say: Starting with a model of $\mathsf{GCH}$, we can pick any ordinal $\beta$ satisfying those two restrictions, and force to obtain a model with the same cofinalities (and cardinals, and ordinals) as the ground model, and where $2^{\aleph_0}=\aleph_\beta$. (That is, in absolute terms, there is no bound.)
This was announced in
and appeared as
What he needs to obtain in the extension that $2^{\aleph_0}=\aleph_\beta$ is that, in the ground model, $\aleph_\beta^{\aleph_0}=\aleph_\beta$, which of course follows from $\mathsf{GCH}$ if $\beta$ is successor or limit of uncountable cofinality.
So, to summarize: The continuum, in "absolute" terms, can be as large as you want. In relative terms as well: There can be continuum many cardinals below. And it can be any $\aleph_\beta$ at all, as long as the restriction given by König's theorem that $\mathrm{cf}(\mathfrak c)>\omega$ is satisfied.
The other question we could ask is whether $2^{\aleph_0}$ can be weakly inaccessible (that is, regular limit). The answer is positive (Solovay's argument does not change any cofinalities), but more is possible: It can even be real-valued measurable, which implies that $2^{\aleph_0}=\aleph_\kappa=\kappa$ for some regular $\kappa$ such that there are $\kappa$ weakly inaccessibles below (that are limit of weakly inaccessibles that themselves are limit of weakly inaccessibles...), it implies that there is an extension of Lebesgue measure defined on all sets of reals, and more. And it is consistent as well that the continuum satisfies various strengthenings of this notion.