One general type of question I am unsure how to approach is "how much information can we deduce about a family given information about its closed fibres?" As a concrete example, say we have a projective variety $X$ over $\mathbb{C}$ and a family of coherent sheaf homomorphisms $\varphi:\mathcal{F}\rightarrow \mathcal{G}$ on $X$ parameterised by some connected $S$. Let's say we know these sheaves are well-behaved (for example, they have constant $h^0$'s), and let's say we know that at every closed $s\in S$ the fibre $\varphi_s: \mathcal{F}_s\rightarrow \mathcal{G}_s$ is an isomorphism; could we deduce that $\varphi$ itself is an isomorphism? Or what about if we know $H^0(\varphi_s): H^0(\mathcal{F}_s) \rightarrow H^0(\mathcal{G}_s)$ is an isomorphism, could we deduce $H^0(\varphi)$ is itself an isomorphism?
2026-03-28 01:07:08.1774660028
How much information about a family is contained in its closed fibres?
72 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in ALGEBRAIC-GEOMETRY
- How to see line bundle on $\mathbb P^1$ intuitively?
- Jacobson radical = nilradical iff every open set of $\text{Spec}A$ contains a closed point.
- Is $ X \to \mathrm{CH}^i (X) $ covariant or contravariant?
- An irreducible $k$-scheme of finite type is "geometrically equidimensional".
- Global section of line bundle of degree 0
- Is there a variant of the implicit function theorem covering a branch of a curve around a singular point?
- Singular points of a curve
- Find Canonical equation of a Hyperbola
- Picard group of a fibration
- Finding a quartic with some prescribed multiplicities
Related Questions in SHEAF-THEORY
- Is $ X \to \mathrm{CH}^i (X) $ covariant or contravariant?
- Question about notation for Čech cohomology and direct image of sheaves in Hartshorne
- Does sheafification preserve surjectivity?
- Image of a morphism of chain complexes of sheaves via direct/inverse image functor
- Tensor of a $k[X]$ module with the structure sheaf of an affine variety is a sheaf
- Sheafy definition for the tangent space at a point on a manifold?
- Whats the relationship between a presheaf and its sheafification?
- First isomorphism theorem of sheaves -- do you need to sheafify if the map is surjective on basis sets?
- An irreducible topological space $X$ admits a constant sheaf iff it is indiscrete.
- Why does a globally generated invertible sheaf admit a global section not vanishing on any irreducible component?
Related Questions in FLATNESS
- Difficulty understanding Hartshorne Theorem IV.4.11
- Flat modules over a PID
- Submodule of a flat module.
- When an integral extension of integral domains is flat?
- When flat submodule is direct summand?
- Flatness in a short exact sequence. If the
- Localization and flatness
- Computing $\operatorname{Tor}^R_1(M,N)$
- Does flatness ascend through a free ring map?
- Can it be that $R[[x]]$ is flat over $R$ but not over $R[x]$?
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
If $\varphi \colon \mathcal{F} \to \mathcal{G}$ is a morphism of coherent sheaves on $X \times S$ such that $\varphi_s \colon \mathcal{F}_s \to \mathcal{G}_s$ is an isomorphism for every closed $s \in S$, then indeed $\varphi$ is an isomorphism. Assume also that $\mathcal{G}$ is flat over $S$.
First, let $\mathcal{C}$ be the cokernel of $\varphi$. Then for every closed $s$ we have an exact sequence $$ \mathcal{F}_s \to \mathcal{G}_s \to \mathcal{C}_s \to 0 $$ (because the restriction functor is right exact). Your assumption implies $\mathcal{C}_s = 0$ for each $s$, and since $\mathcal{C}$ is coherent, it follows that $\mathcal{C} = 0$, so that $\varphi$ is surjective.
Now let $\mathcal{K}$ be the kernel of $\varphi$. Using flatness of $\mathcal{G}$ we obtain an exact sequence $$ 0 \to \mathcal{K}_s \to \mathcal{F}_s \to \mathcal{G}_s \to 0 $$ and again your assumption imples $\mathcal{K}_s = 0$, hence $\mathcal{K} = 0$, because it is coherent. Thus, $\varphi$ is an isomorphism.