I am writing a program(this is not a programming question) this program calculates how small an inch needs to get until it reaches 1 Planck Length of an inch. I know there are 1,587,999,999,999,999,744,856,664,160,920,216 Planck Lengths in 1 inch, now i need to have a thing in my code that tests when a number gets smaller than 1 of how many Planck Lengths in 1 inch. Its hard to explain and this question may be removed to do not explaining correctly but i have no idea how to get this. Also this wont let me tag my question properly since i don't have 1000 rep so if this gets taken off for incorrectly tagging, don't blame me, it won't let me tag it for "planck" or "length" and not even for "inch".
2025-01-13 02:15:29.1736734529
How much of 1 Planck Length goes into 1 inch?
1.2k Views Asked by Cubit-Games https://math.techqa.club/user/cubit-games/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in DIMENSIONAL-ANALYSIS
- Damped Driven Oscillator Dimensional Analysis
- How much of 1 Planck Length goes into 1 inch?
- Hausdorff dimension of F and f(F)
- Unit and dimension of angles
- Please help me solve this equation (Dimensional Analysis)
- How to solve $f(x)$ in the equation $f(x)/F(x)=\ln(2)$
- Obtaining a solution space to an inverse kinematics problem (mapping a higher dimensional space onto a lower one)
- Checking units following differentiation
- Formal definition of "perimeter" of 3-dimensional polyhedron (also projection v. transformation v. mapping confusion)
- How to find the corresponding matrix to the transformation?
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- A community project: prove (or disprove) that $\sum_{n\geq 1}\frac{\sin(2^n)}{n}$ is convergent
- Alternative way of expressing a quantied statement with "Some"
Popular # Hahtags
real-analysis
calculus
linear-algebra
probability
abstract-algebra
integration
sequences-and-series
combinatorics
general-topology
matrices
functional-analysis
complex-analysis
geometry
group-theory
algebra-precalculus
probability-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
limits
analysis
number-theory
measure-theory
elementary-number-theory
statistics
multivariable-calculus
functions
derivatives
discrete-mathematics
differential-geometry
inequality
trigonometry
Popular Questions
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- Difference between "≈", "≃", and "≅"
- Easy way of memorizing values of sine, cosine, and tangent
- How to calculate the intersection of two planes?
- What does "∈" mean?
- If you roll a fair six sided die twice, what's the probability that you get the same number both times?
- Probability of getting exactly 2 heads in 3 coins tossed with order not important?
- Fourier transform for dummies
- Limit of $(1+ x/n)^n$ when $n$ tends to infinity
I think you're experiencing rounding error with your number.
The measured value of the Planck length is only to about six significant figures:
$$L_P \approx 1.616199(97) \cdot 10^{-33} cm.$$
The numbers in parentheses indicate measurement error in the last significant figure (the last $9$) so it's $(1.616199 \pm 0.0000097) \cdot 10^{-33}$ cm.
Let's call the number out front $1.6162$.
Multiplying by $0.3937$ international inches per centimeter gives $L_P \approx 0.63629794 \cdot 10^{-33}$ inches, so there are $1.571591 \cdot 10^{34}$ Planck lengths per inch.
Now ... to get to your question. If you have something that's an inch long, and are shrinking it for some reason, you'll need to be able to keep track of a lot of significant figures. So you need some kind of arbitrary-precision arithmetic.
On the other hand, if you're making some kind of incremental thing that gives you logarithmic upgrades or something like that, you could just switch scales every factor of a million or so, and then just use regular double-precision.