I have some doubts on how to apply the calculus of variations to find a parametric curve which minimizes a certain functional. Let $\gamma: [0,1]\longrightarrow\mathbb{R}^2$ be a curve, and let $\gamma(t)=(x(t),y(t))$.
Let \begin{equation} F(\gamma) :=\int_0^1\alpha x(t)+\beta y(t)\ \text{dt} \end{equation}
I'd like to find a curve $\gamma$ that minimizes this functional, for some specific values $\alpha,\beta$. The problem is that the functional depends separately on the components of $\gamma$, and i'm unsure if (and eventually how) I can apply the calculus of variations to this case.
You can apply calculus of variations to this problem. You will use the Euler Lagrange Equation. Let $f(x,y)=\alpha x+\beta y$. The functions $x$ and $y$ that minimize the functional $F(\gamma)=\int_0^1 f(x,y)\,dt$ will satisfy the Euler-Lagrange Equations are satisfied: $$\frac{\partial f}{\partial x}-\frac{d}{dt}\frac{\partial f}{\partial x'}=0$$ and $$\frac{\partial f}{\partial y}-\frac{d}{dt}\frac{\partial f}{\partial y'}=0.$$
Evaluating both of these, we get $\alpha=0$ and $\beta=0$, which is a contradiction (unless you chose those particular and boring values for $\alpha$ and $\beta$). We conclude, therefore, that there is no minimizing curve $\gamma$. In retrospect, this makes sense because if, say, $\alpha=\beta=1$, we could choose many functions which make our functional evaluate to very very small numbers. We could choose $x(t)=y(t)=-10^9$, or $x(t)=y(t)=-10^{10},$ or even $x(t)=y(t)=-10^{10!}$. There is no limit to how small a value your functional can evaluate to.
You may look at this paper on constrained calculus of variations if you want to constrain $x$ and $y$ to just certain types of functions.
The point is, though, when you have multiple functions in your functional, the Euler Lagrange Equation has to be satisfied for each of them.