Assume you have a space $X$ and a homomorphism $r:\pi_1X\to S_n$. Then $r$ defines a n-sheeted covering space $Y$ of $X$. My question is, can you immediatly determine if $Y$ is a normal covering using only $r$ (without computing $\pi_1Y\subset\pi_1X $ and checking if it is a normal subgroup.
Example: $X=S^1\vee S^1$, and let $a,b$ denote the two generators of $\pi_1 X$. Look at the r defined via $a\mapsto (12),\ b\mapsto(123).$ This gives rise to a three sheeted cover $Y$ over $X$. Is this cover normal?
Again, I can check it because in this case it is very easy to draw $Y$ and it is possible to calculate $\pi_1Y$ by using Van Kampen. My question is - can you see if $Y$ is normal or not only by looking at $r$.
Let $p:Y\rightarrow X$ be the covering. Then the orbits of the $\pi_1(X)$ action (via $r$) correspond to the connected components of $Y$. So let's assume this action is transitive, so that $Y$ is connected [I don't know what normality would mean when $Y$ was disconnected].
Then $p_\ast\pi_1(Y)\le\pi_1(X)$, and $rp_\ast\pi_1(Y)$ is a point stabilizer, since the point stabilizer is precisely which loops lift to loops in $Y$.
So for $p_\ast\pi_1(Y)$ to be normal, the point stabilizer of $r\pi_1(X)$ must be normal. But then it stabilizes all points (since point stabilizers are conjugate), and so $rp_\ast\pi_1(Y)$ must be the identity subgroup.
Thus, $p:Y\rightarrow X$ is a normal covering precisely when the action of $\pi_1(X)$ (via $r$) is regular. I guess that's one reason why a normal covering is also called regular.