Let $g$ be a Lie algebra. How to compute Casimir elements of $g \otimes g$? I am asking this question because in the book a guide to quantum groups, page 80, there is an equation $r_{12} + r_{21}=t$, where $t$ is the Casimir of $g \otimes g$. We have $ g \otimes g = h \otimes h \oplus n_- \otimes n_+ \oplus n_+ \otimes n_-$. Let $t_0$ be the $h \otimes h$ component of $t$. On page 83, example 3.1.5, it is said that in the case of $g = sl_3$, $$ t_0 = \frac{2}{3} H_{\alpha} \otimes H_{\alpha} + \frac{1}{3} H_{\beta} \otimes H_{\alpha} + \frac{1}{3} H_{\alpha} \otimes H_{\beta} + \frac{2}{3} H_{\beta} \otimes H_{\beta}.$$ My question is: how to compute $t$ and $t_0$? Any help will be greatly appreciated!
2025-01-13 05:45:28.1736747128
How to compute Casimir elements of $g \otimes g$?
224 Views Asked by LJR https://math.techqa.club/user/ljr/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in REPRESENTATION-THEORY
- Conjugation preserves representation?
- linear representations, usual assumption
- Example of representation
- Simultaneously diagonalize the regular representation of C2 (+) C2 (+) C2.
- In what sense are the linear characters among the irreducible characters
- representation of sym^2(V)
- Proof that the induced class function $\theta^G$ is a character if $\theta$ is a representation on subgroup
- Character representation of right regular representation as sum of irreducible characters
- For simple $\mathbb C[G]$-modules is the representation unique
- Formulas give irreducible representation, $SL(2, \mathbb{C})$.
Related Questions in LIE-ALGEBRAS
- How do I make sense of terms $X^j\partial_j(Y^i)$ in the Lie bracket of vector fields?
- When derivations are exactly homomorphisms?
- Ideals in Lie algebras
- Lie bracket on $\Gamma(TM\oplus (M\times \mathfrak{g}))$?
- 2-dimensional derived subalgebra of 3-dimensional Lie algebra is abelian
- How are groups with the same Lie Algebra inequivalent?
- Generators of a semi simple lie algebra must be traceless
- How does a Lie algebra act on a tensor product of L-modules?
- Representation of a Kac-Moody algebra
- Why are there no nonabelian Lie groups with dimension two?
Related Questions in MATHEMATICAL-PHYSICS
- Solving differential equation and obtain expressions for unknowns?
- Eliminate all parameters from the differential equation $u_t-Au_x-Bu^3+Cu_{xx}=0$.
- Finding highest weight of a $gl(3)$ submodule of a $gl(4)$-module
- Is this Fourier Transform relation correct?
- Calabi's theorem
- Why can the equivariant volume of a non-compact space be finite?
- Determine if this vector field is a conservative force field?
- How to plot a qubit on the Bloch sphere?
- Rounding in the method of least squares for linear regression analysis?
- What exactly does the Hilbert scheme of points parametrize?
Related Questions in QUANTUM-GROUPS
- On proposition I.3.2 of 'Quantum groups' by Kassel.
- Relation between quantum affine algebra $U_q(\widehat{sl_2})$ and the affine Lie algebra $\widehat{sl_2}$?
- Relation between Yangian $Y(sl_2)$ and quantum affine algebra $U_q(\widehat{sl_2})$.
- Graphical calculus for braided Hopf algebras
- Is the category of all finite dimensional modules of $g$ equivalent to the category of all finite dimensional modules of $U_q(g)$?
- The functor from $sl_2-mod$ to $U_q(sl_2)-mod$.
- Notation in quantum groups.
- GNS construction of a weight
- How to compute Casimir elements of $g \otimes g$?
- Relations between Lie algebras and Lie coalgebras.
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- A community project: prove (or disprove) that $\sum_{n\geq 1}\frac{\sin(2^n)}{n}$ is convergent
- Alternative way of expressing a quantied statement with "Some"
Popular # Hahtags
real-analysis
calculus
linear-algebra
probability
abstract-algebra
integration
sequences-and-series
combinatorics
general-topology
matrices
functional-analysis
complex-analysis
geometry
group-theory
algebra-precalculus
probability-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
limits
analysis
number-theory
measure-theory
elementary-number-theory
statistics
multivariable-calculus
functions
derivatives
discrete-mathematics
differential-geometry
inequality
trigonometry
Popular Questions
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- Difference between "≈", "≃", and "≅"
- Easy way of memorizing values of sine, cosine, and tangent
- How to calculate the intersection of two planes?
- What does "∈" mean?
- If you roll a fair six sided die twice, what's the probability that you get the same number both times?
- Probability of getting exactly 2 heads in 3 coins tossed with order not important?
- Fourier transform for dummies
- Limit of $(1+ x/n)^n$ when $n$ tends to infinity
Let $g$ be a semisimple Lie algebra with the root system $\Delta$. We fix a Cartan subalgebra $\mathfrak{h}$ of $g$. For each $\alpha \in \Delta$, we define $E_{\alpha} \in g$ by the formula $[h, E_{\alpha}] = \alpha(h) E_{\alpha}$ for all $h \in \mathfrak{h}$. Then for $\alpha, \beta \in \Delta$, \begin{align} & [h, [E_{\alpha}, E_{\beta}]] = -[ E_{\alpha}, [E_{\beta}, h] ] - [E_{\beta}, [h, E_{\alpha}]] = - [E_{\alpha}, -\beta(h) E_{\beta}] - [E_{\beta}, \alpha(h)E_{\alpha}] \\ & = (\alpha(h) + \beta(h))[E_{\alpha}, E_{\beta}] = (\alpha + \beta)(h)[E_{\alpha}, E_{\beta}]. \end{align} It follows that if $\alpha +\beta \in \Delta$, then $[E_{\alpha}, E_{\beta}] = E_{\alpha+\beta}$ and $0$ if $\alpha + \beta \not\in \Delta$.
By definition, a Casimir element in $g \otimes g \cong g \otimes g^*$ is an element $t = \sum_{i} x_i \otimes x_i^*$, where $x_i$, $i \in I$, is a basis of $g$. Now we choose $\mathfrak{h} = \text{Span}\{H_{\alpha_i}: i \in I\}$, where $\alpha_i$, $i \in I$, is the set of simple roots. A basis of $g$ is $\{H_{\alpha_i}, i \in I, E_{\alpha}, \alpha \in \Delta\}$. We have the Killing from on $g$ which is given by $$ (x, y) = \text{Tr}(\text{ad}_x \text{ad}_y), \quad x, y \in g. $$ We have \begin{align} & (E_{\alpha}, E_{\beta}) = \text{Tr}(\text{ad}_{E_{\alpha}} \text{ad}_{E_{\beta}}). \\ & (\text{ad}_{E_{\alpha}}\text{ad}_{E_{\beta}})(E_{\gamma}) \\ & = [E_{\alpha}, [E_{\beta}, E_{\gamma}]] \\ & = E_{\alpha + \beta + \gamma}. \end{align} We have $E_{\alpha+\beta+\gamma} = E_{\gamma}$ if and only if $\alpha+\beta=0$. Therefore \begin{align} & (E_{\alpha}, E_{\beta}) = \text{Tr}(\text{ad}_{E_{\alpha}} \text{ad}_{E_{\beta}}) \neq 0 \end{align} if and only if $\alpha = - \beta$. Therefore the Casimir is \begin{align} t=\sum_{\alpha \in \Delta} E_{-\alpha} \otimes E_{\alpha} + t_0, \end{align} where $t_0 \in \mathfrak{h} \otimes \mathfrak{h}$ is the Cartan part of $t$.
Now we compute $t_0$ in the case of $sl_3$. We have \begin{align} & ad(H_i)ad(H_j)(H_k)=0,\\ & ad(H_1)ad(H_2)(E_1) = -2E_1, \\ & ad(H_1)ad(H_2)(E_2) = -2E_2, \\ & ad(H_1)ad(H_2)([E_1, E_2]) = [E_1, E_2], \\ & ad(H_1)ad(H_2)(F_1) = -2F_1, \\ & ad(H_1)ad(H_2)(F_2) = -2F_2, \\ & ad(H_1)ad(H_2)([F_1, F_2]) = [F_1, F_2]. \end{align} Therefore $$ (H_1, H_2) = -6. $$ \begin{align} & ad(H_i)ad(H_j)(H_k)=0,\\ & ad(H_1)ad(H_1)(E_1) = 4E_1, \\ & ad(H_1)ad(H_1)(E_2) = E_2, \\ & ad(H_1)ad(H_1)([E_1, E_2]) = [E_1, E_2], \\ & ad(H_1)ad(H_1)(F_1) = 4 F_1, \\ & ad(H_1)ad(H_1)(F_2) = F_2, \\ & ad(H_1)ad(H_1)([F_1, F_2]) = [F_1, F_2]. \end{align} $$ (H_1, H_1) = 12. $$ Similarly, $$ (H_2, H_1) = -6, (H_2, H_2) = 12. $$ Therefore we can take $$ t_0 = \frac{1}{3} ( H_1 \otimes H_1 + H_2 \otimes H_2 ) + \frac{1}{6}(H_1 \otimes H_2 + H_2 \otimes H_1) $$ if we normalize the Killing from such that $(x, y) = 2$ for $x, y \in g$. But it seems there is a problem of the signs in the above computations: $(H_2, H_1) = -6, (H_2, H_2) = 12$.