Let $g$ be a Lie algebra. How to compute Casimir elements of $g \otimes g$? I am asking this question because in the book a guide to quantum groups, page 80, there is an equation $r_{12} + r_{21}=t$, where $t$ is the Casimir of $g \otimes g$. We have $ g \otimes g = h \otimes h \oplus n_- \otimes n_+ \oplus n_+ \otimes n_-$. Let $t_0$ be the $h \otimes h$ component of $t$. On page 83, example 3.1.5, it is said that in the case of $g = sl_3$, $$ t_0 = \frac{2}{3} H_{\alpha} \otimes H_{\alpha} + \frac{1}{3} H_{\beta} \otimes H_{\alpha} + \frac{1}{3} H_{\alpha} \otimes H_{\beta} + \frac{2}{3} H_{\beta} \otimes H_{\beta}.$$ My question is: how to compute $t$ and $t_0$? Any help will be greatly appreciated!
2026-04-07 13:46:43.1775569603
How to compute Casimir elements of $g \otimes g$?
217 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in REPRESENTATION-THEORY
- How does $\operatorname{Ind}^G_H$ behave with respect to $\bigoplus$?
- Minimal dimension needed for linearization of group action
- How do you prove that category of representations of $G_m$ is equivalent to the category of finite dimensional graded vector spaces?
- Assuming unitarity of arbitrary representations in proof of Schur's lemma
- Are representation isomorphisms of permutation representations necessarily permutation matrices?
- idempotent in quiver theory
- Help with a definition in Serre's Linear Representations of Finite Groups
- Are there special advantages in this representation of sl2?
- Properties of symmetric and alternating characters
- Representation theory of $S_3$
Related Questions in LIE-ALGEBRAS
- Holonomy bundle is a covering space
- Computing the logarithm of an exponentiated matrix?
- Need help with notation. Is this lower dot an operation?
- On uniparametric subgroups of a Lie group
- Are there special advantages in this representation of sl2?
- $SU(2)$ adjoint and fundamental transformations
- Radical of Der(L) where L is a Lie Algebra
- $SU(3)$ irreps decomposition in subgroup irreps
- Given a representation $\phi: L \rightarrow \mathfrak {gl}(V)$ $\phi(L)$ in End $V$ leaves invariant precisely the same subspaces as $L$.
- Tensors transformations under $so(4)$
Related Questions in MATHEMATICAL-PHYSICS
- Why boundary conditions in Sturm-Liouville problem are homogeneous?
- What is the value of alternating series which I mention below
- Are there special advantages in this representation of sl2?
- Intuition behind quaternion multiplication with zero scalar
- Return probability random walk
- "Good" Linear Combinations of a Perturbed Wave Function
- Yang–Mills theory and mass gap
- Self adjoint operators on incomplete spaces
- Algebraic geometry and algebraic topology used in string theory
- Compute time required to travel given distance with constant acceleration and known initial speed
Related Questions in QUANTUM-GROUPS
- Verma module $V(\lambda)$ of $U_q(\mathfrak{sl}_2)$ is not simple $\implies$ $\lambda = \pm q^n$
- Structure of simple modules of $U_q(\mathfrak{sl}_2)$ at a root of unity.
- What are $q$-deformations?
- Intuition behind the relation of commutative Hopf algebra and Groups
- Definition of the Quantum plane and the Yang Baxter Equation
- Quantum invariants of 2-knots
- Integrable modules of quantum groups.
- Bogoliubov Transform
- Reference on correspondence between commutative Hopf Algebras and Groups
- What is the relation between crystals and crystal bases?
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?


Let $g$ be a semisimple Lie algebra with the root system $\Delta$. We fix a Cartan subalgebra $\mathfrak{h}$ of $g$. For each $\alpha \in \Delta$, we define $E_{\alpha} \in g$ by the formula $[h, E_{\alpha}] = \alpha(h) E_{\alpha}$ for all $h \in \mathfrak{h}$. Then for $\alpha, \beta \in \Delta$, \begin{align} & [h, [E_{\alpha}, E_{\beta}]] = -[ E_{\alpha}, [E_{\beta}, h] ] - [E_{\beta}, [h, E_{\alpha}]] = - [E_{\alpha}, -\beta(h) E_{\beta}] - [E_{\beta}, \alpha(h)E_{\alpha}] \\ & = (\alpha(h) + \beta(h))[E_{\alpha}, E_{\beta}] = (\alpha + \beta)(h)[E_{\alpha}, E_{\beta}]. \end{align} It follows that if $\alpha +\beta \in \Delta$, then $[E_{\alpha}, E_{\beta}] = E_{\alpha+\beta}$ and $0$ if $\alpha + \beta \not\in \Delta$.
By definition, a Casimir element in $g \otimes g \cong g \otimes g^*$ is an element $t = \sum_{i} x_i \otimes x_i^*$, where $x_i$, $i \in I$, is a basis of $g$. Now we choose $\mathfrak{h} = \text{Span}\{H_{\alpha_i}: i \in I\}$, where $\alpha_i$, $i \in I$, is the set of simple roots. A basis of $g$ is $\{H_{\alpha_i}, i \in I, E_{\alpha}, \alpha \in \Delta\}$. We have the Killing from on $g$ which is given by $$ (x, y) = \text{Tr}(\text{ad}_x \text{ad}_y), \quad x, y \in g. $$ We have \begin{align} & (E_{\alpha}, E_{\beta}) = \text{Tr}(\text{ad}_{E_{\alpha}} \text{ad}_{E_{\beta}}). \\ & (\text{ad}_{E_{\alpha}}\text{ad}_{E_{\beta}})(E_{\gamma}) \\ & = [E_{\alpha}, [E_{\beta}, E_{\gamma}]] \\ & = E_{\alpha + \beta + \gamma}. \end{align} We have $E_{\alpha+\beta+\gamma} = E_{\gamma}$ if and only if $\alpha+\beta=0$. Therefore \begin{align} & (E_{\alpha}, E_{\beta}) = \text{Tr}(\text{ad}_{E_{\alpha}} \text{ad}_{E_{\beta}}) \neq 0 \end{align} if and only if $\alpha = - \beta$. Therefore the Casimir is \begin{align} t=\sum_{\alpha \in \Delta} E_{-\alpha} \otimes E_{\alpha} + t_0, \end{align} where $t_0 \in \mathfrak{h} \otimes \mathfrak{h}$ is the Cartan part of $t$.
Now we compute $t_0$ in the case of $sl_3$. We have \begin{align} & ad(H_i)ad(H_j)(H_k)=0,\\ & ad(H_1)ad(H_2)(E_1) = -2E_1, \\ & ad(H_1)ad(H_2)(E_2) = -2E_2, \\ & ad(H_1)ad(H_2)([E_1, E_2]) = [E_1, E_2], \\ & ad(H_1)ad(H_2)(F_1) = -2F_1, \\ & ad(H_1)ad(H_2)(F_2) = -2F_2, \\ & ad(H_1)ad(H_2)([F_1, F_2]) = [F_1, F_2]. \end{align} Therefore $$ (H_1, H_2) = -6. $$ \begin{align} & ad(H_i)ad(H_j)(H_k)=0,\\ & ad(H_1)ad(H_1)(E_1) = 4E_1, \\ & ad(H_1)ad(H_1)(E_2) = E_2, \\ & ad(H_1)ad(H_1)([E_1, E_2]) = [E_1, E_2], \\ & ad(H_1)ad(H_1)(F_1) = 4 F_1, \\ & ad(H_1)ad(H_1)(F_2) = F_2, \\ & ad(H_1)ad(H_1)([F_1, F_2]) = [F_1, F_2]. \end{align} $$ (H_1, H_1) = 12. $$ Similarly, $$ (H_2, H_1) = -6, (H_2, H_2) = 12. $$ Therefore we can take $$ t_0 = \frac{1}{3} ( H_1 \otimes H_1 + H_2 \otimes H_2 ) + \frac{1}{6}(H_1 \otimes H_2 + H_2 \otimes H_1) $$ if we normalize the Killing from such that $(x, y) = 2$ for $x, y \in g$. But it seems there is a problem of the signs in the above computations: $(H_2, H_1) = -6, (H_2, H_2) = 12$.