I know if $T:R^n → R^n$ is linear operator then, following two statements are equivalent
a) $[T]$ is invertible matrix, where $[T]$ is matrix representation of $T$
b) $T$ is one-to-one operator.
Now, if i consider $T: R^n → R^m$ where $m ≠ n$ then how to verify given transformation is one-to-one?
Is I need to take the help of Rank nullity theorem? First I need to find $[T]$ i. e. Matrix representation of $T$ then, first I need to find $rank([T])$ and by using rank-nullity theorem,
$rank([T]) + nullity([T]) = n$
→ $nullity([T]) = n - rank([T])$
If $nullity([T]) = 0$ then $T$ is one-to-one transformations form $R^n$ to $R^m$ Is am i correct? If i am correct, i need reason behind this? Please I need help?
The first part of your post can be generalized by the following theorem.
Now coming to your question, "What happens when we have two Vector Spaces with unequal dimensions?When can we say a Linear Transformation between two such Vector Spaces is $one-one?$"
Well consider the following result,
Proof:
Let $T$ be $one-one$.
If $x\in Ker(T)$, then $T(x)=0=T(0)\implies x=0\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\text{[Since T is one-one]}$.
Thus $Ker(T)=\{0\}$
Conversely, let $Ker(T)=\{0\}$.
Consider, $T(x)=T(y)\implies T(x)-T(y)=0\implies T(x-y)=0 \implies x-y=0\implies x=y.$
Thus $T$ is $one-one.$
For computational purpose, we usually find the matrix of Linear Transformation and then perform the row reductions to obtain the nullity.
I would like to end the answer with the following question for you, "What guarantees the existence of such a matrix for each Linear Transformation? Or in other words can there be a Linear Transformation with no matrix representation?"