I would like to count subgroups of each order (2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12) of $S_4$, and, hopefully, convince others that I counted them correctly. In order to do this by hand in the term exam, I need a clever way to do this because there can be as many subgroups of a group of order 24 as $2^{23}$.
Do you know how to do this?
(I would be most grateful if you could tell me what part of the answer to the old question answers my question before voting to close.)
By Lagrange's theorem, the order of a subgroup divides 24, so we are looking for subgroups of orders 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, and 24. We go through the list, often using Sylow's theorems:
Subgroups of order 2 are in 1–1 correspondance with elements of order 2, so you get 4-choose-2 = 6 transpositions $\langle (i,j) \rangle$ and 4-choose-2-over-2 = 3 double transpositions $\langle (i,j)(k,l) \rangle$.
By Sylow's theorem the subgroups of order 3 are all conjugate, so $\langle (1,2,3) \rangle$, $\langle (1,2,4) \rangle$, $\langle (1,3,4) \rangle$, and $\langle (2,3,4) \rangle$.
Size 4 is messy, so I delay it.
A subgroup of order 6 must have a normal Sylow 3-subgroup, so must live inside the normalizer (inside S4) of a Sylow 3-subgroup. The Sylow 3-subgroups are just the various alternating groups of degree 3, and their normalizers are various symmetric groups of degree 3, so are exactly the 4 subgroups of order 6.
All subgroups of order 8 are conjugate by Sylow's theorem, so we just have $\langle (i,k), (i,j,k,l) \rangle$ which is dihedral.
A subgroup of order 4 is a subgroup of a Sylow 2-subgroup, so either cyclic $\langle (i,j,k,l) \rangle$ or one of the two kinds of Klein 4-subgroups $\langle (i,j), (k,l) \rangle$ (3 subgroups), or the true K4 $\langle (i,j)(k,l), (i,k)(j,l) \rangle$ (normal).
A subgroup of order 12 either has a normal Sylow 2-subgroup (and the only subgroups of order 4 with normalizers having elements of order 3 are K4 with normalizer A4) or a normal Sylow 3-subgroup, but in the latter case the normalizer of a Sylow 3-subgroup is only size 6, not 12.
Those were all possible orders, and for each order we proved any subgroup of that order had a specific form, and then counted how many had that form.