I have a Language $L=L(\{R,P\},\emptyset,\{c_0,c_1,c_2\})$ where $R$ denotes a two-digit and $P$ a one-digit relation symbol. And I got the set $S=\{\forall x R(x,x), \forall x\exists y \neg R(x,y), \forall x\exists y R(x,y), P(c_0), \forall x\forall y ((P(x) \land R(x,y)) \rightarrow P(y)) \}$.
I have to find a Herbrand-Model $M$ for $L$ such that all elements of $S$ are satisfied.
My problem is that I don't really see what I have to do here since the domain of the Herbrand-Model is simply all closed terms of $L$ (so nothing I can change) and I am not quite sure how to define the interpretaion of $M$ such that it would actually help.
Thx in advance!
2026-04-09 04:07:03.1775707623
How to find a Herbrand-Model to a given set
719 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in LOGIC
- Theorems in MK would imply theorems in ZFC
- What is (mathematically) minimal computer architecture to run any software
- What formula proved in MK or Godel Incompleteness theorem
- Determine the truth value and validity of the propositions given
- Is this a commonly known paradox?
- Help with Propositional Logic Proof
- Symbol for assignment of a truth-value?
- Find the truth value of... empty set?
- Do I need the axiom of choice to prove this statement?
- Prove that any truth function $f$ can be represented by a formula $φ$ in cnf by negating a formula in dnf
Related Questions in MODEL-THEORY
- What is the definition of 'constructible group'?
- Translate into first order logic: "$a, b, c$ are the lengths of the sides of a triangle"
- Existence of indiscernible set in model equivalent to another indiscernible set
- A ring embeds in a field iff every finitely generated sub-ring does it
- Graph with a vertex of infinite degree elementary equiv. with a graph with vertices of arbitrarily large finite degree
- What would be the function to make a formula false?
- Sufficient condition for isomorphism of $L$-structures when $L$ is relational
- Show that PA can prove the pigeon-hole principle
- Decidability and "truth value"
- Prove or disprove: $\exists x \forall y \,\,\varphi \models \forall y \exists x \,\ \varphi$
Related Questions in PREDICATE-LOGIC
- Find the truth value of... empty set?
- What does Kx mean in this equation? [in Carnap or Russell and Whitehead's logical notation]
- Exchanging RAA with double negation: is this valid?
- Logical Connectives and Quantifiers
- Is this proof correct? (Proof Theory)
- Is there only a finite number of non-equivalent formulas in the predicate logic?
- Are Proofs of Dependent Pair Types Equivalent to Finding an Inverse Function?
- How to build a list of all the wfs (well-formed sentences)?
- Translations into logical notation
- What would be the function to make a formula false?
Related Questions in FIRST-ORDER-LOGIC
- Proving the schema of separation from replacement
- Find the truth value of... empty set?
- Exchanging RAA with double negation: is this valid?
- Translate into first order logic: "$a, b, c$ are the lengths of the sides of a triangle"
- Primitive recursive functions of bounded sum
- Show formula which does not have quantifier elimination in theory of infinite equivalence relations.
- Logical Connectives and Quantifiers
- Is this proof correct? (Proof Theory)
- Is there only a finite number of non-equivalent formulas in the predicate logic?
- How to build a list of all the wfs (well-formed sentences)?
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
An Herbrand structure $\mathcal M$ for a certain language $\mathcal L$ is a structure made of "syntactical stuff".
Thus, constants of the language plays a double role : they are "names" in the language to denote objects and thy are the "objects" themselves. And so on with "complex" terms buit up from constants and function symbols.
In the FOL language above, with constant symbols $c_0,c_1, c_2$, no function symbols and two predicate symbols: $R$ and $P$, we have that the constants must be considered as "objects": the elements of the domain $M$ of the model.
Consider now the set of formulas:
to be satisfied by $\mathcal M$.
Obviously (fourth formula) we need: $P(c_0)$, i.e. we need that $\{ c_0 \} \subseteq P^M$ (the intepretation of the unary predicate symbol $P$).
In order to satisfy the first formula: $∀xR(x,x)$, we need that: $R(c_0,c_0), R(c_1,c_1), R(c_2,c_2)$. Thus: $\{ (c_0,c_0), (c_1,c_1), (c_2,c_2) \} \subseteq R^M$.
This satisfy also the third formula.
For the second one, we need e.g.: $\lnot R(c_0,c_1), \lnot R(c_1,c_2), \lnot R(c_2, c_0)$.
The remaining cases must be handled accordingly, taking into account the fifth formula.
In conclusion, we can define $\mathcal M$ with:
and check that all the formulas in $S$ are satisfied in $\mathcal M$.