I noticed that this $K$ is one of the divisors of $P-1$. So my solutions is looping on the divisors of $P-1$ in ascending order, till I find the first divisor $d$ where $N^d \equiv 1 \pmod{P}$. Modular exponentiation is performed in $O\left(\log_2(\text{exponent})\right)$. But this solution works in $O\left((\text{number of divisors}) \cdot \log_2(\text{exponent})\right)$. Is there any better solution?
2026-03-25 21:01:38.1774472498
How to find the least positive $K$ such that $N^K \equiv 1 \pmod{P}$ where $P$ is prime and $P$ doesn't divide $N$?
84 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in PRIME-NUMBERS
- New prime number
- Confirmation of Proof: $\forall n \in \mathbb{N}, \ \pi (n) \geqslant \frac{\log n}{2\log 2}$
- How do I prove this question involving primes?
- What exactly is the definition of Carmichael numbers?
- I'm having a problem interpreting and starting this problem with primes.
- Decimal expansion of $\frac{1}{p}$: what is its period?
- Multiplying prime numbers
- Find the number of relatively prime numbers from $10$ to $100$
- A congruence with the Euler's totient function and sum of divisors function
- Squares of two coprime numbers
Related Questions in MODULAR-ARITHMETIC
- How do I find the least x that satisfies this congruence properties?
- Counting the number of solutions of the congruence $x^k\equiv h$ (mod q)
- Remainder of $22!$ upon division with $23$?
- Does increasing the modulo decrease collisions?
- Congruence equation ...
- Reducing products in modular arithmetic
- Product of sums of all subsets mod $k$?
- Lack of clarity over modular arithmetic notation
- How to prove infinitely many integer triples $x,y,z$ such that $x^2 + y^2 + z^2$ is divisible by $(x + y +z)$
- Can $\mathbb{Z}_2$ be constructed as the closure of $4\mathbb{Z}+1$?
Related Questions in CONTEST-MATH
- Solution to a hard inequality
- Length of Shadow from a lamp?
- All possible values of coordinate k such that triangle ABC is a right triangle?
- Prove that $1+{1\over 1+{1\over 1+{1\over 1+{1\over 1+...}}}}=\sqrt{1+\sqrt{1+\sqrt{1+\sqrt{1+...}}}}$
- Lack of clarity over modular arithmetic notation
- if $n\nmid 2^n+1, n|2^{2^n+1}+1$ show that the $3^k\cdot p$ is good postive integers numbers
- How to prove infinitely many integer triples $x,y,z$ such that $x^2 + y^2 + z^2$ is divisible by $(x + y +z)$
- Proving that $b-a\ge \pi $
- Volume of sphere split into eight sections?
- Largest Cube that fits the space between two Spheres?
Related Questions in EXPONENTIATION
- exponential equation with different bases; no logarithms
- Is square root of $y^2$ for every $y>0,y\in\mathbb{R}$?
- Definite sum for $(1+a)^n$
- Fractional exponents definition and the additive law of exponents
- Fourth term in the expansion of $(1-2x)^{3/2}$
- Why is $\int_{0}^{t} e^{nt} \mathrm{\ dt} = \frac{1}{n} \left(e^{nt} - 1\right)$? [solved; notation is also faulty in the first place]
- Exponentiation property of the modulo operator
- When are $\left(\frac{a}{b}\right)^c$ and $\frac{a^c}{b^c}$ equivalent?
- How can I rewrite expression to get log out of exponent
- Compare $2^{2016}$ and $10^{605}$ without a calculator
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
You can do slightly better, the number of distinct prime divisors in place of the number of divisors.
We have the prime decomposition of $P{-}1 = \prod q_i^{\large a_i}$. And we know that $K$ divides this number so $K = \prod q_i^{\large b_i}$.
Then we can establish each $b_i$ in turn by calculating $c_{i0} = N^{\large (P-1)/q_i^{a_i}}$ and then successively raising this to the $q_i^{th}$ power, $c_{ij} = c_{i(j-1)}^{\large q_i},$ until $c_{ij}\equiv 1\bmod P$, giving $b_i = j$.
This gives us the value of $K$ because clearly since $N^K\equiv 1 \Rightarrow N^{jK} \equiv 1 \bmod P$ also but if we don't have a sufficient multiplicity of one of the prime factors of $K$ in the exponent, we cannot be dealing with a multiple of $K$.