How to find the supremum and infimum of this set?

2.3k Views Asked by At

$\{3-\frac{17}{n}:n\in\Bbb{N}\} \subseteq A \subseteq (-\infty,3].$ Prove that A has an upper bound and find $\sup(A) $.

4

There are 4 best solutions below

0
On BEST ANSWER

First is the statement $\{3-17/n\} \subseteq A \subset (-\infty,3] $ possible.

If $x = 3-17/k \in \{3-17/n\}$ then $x <3$ so $x \in (-\infty,3] $ so, yes, the statement is possible.

If $x \in A$ then $x \in (-\infty,3]$ so $x \le 3$ so A is bounded above and $\sup A \le 3$ exists.

If $y < 3$ we can find a natural $n $ where $n > 17/ (3-y)$. So $0 <1/n < (3-y)/17$ So $0 <17/n <3-y $ so $y <3-17/n \in \{3-17/n\} \subseteq A$.

So $y < 3$ means $y$ is not an upper bound.

So $\sup A = 3$.

Now $(-\infty,3] $ is not bound below so $A $ needn't be bound below either. ($A $ could be $(-\infty,3] $ for all we know, or it could be any other subset). So $\inf A $ need not exist and is indeterminable if it did.

Well, almost, $-14=3-17/1 \in \{3-17/n\}\in A $ so if $\inf A $ existed (which it might not) it would be less than or equal to $-14$.

0
On

$A$ is bounded above by $3$, hence $\sup(A)$ exits, and it equals to $3$. To see this, if $\epsilon > 0$, choose $ n > \dfrac{17}{\epsilon}$, then $3- \dfrac{17}{n} > 3-\epsilon$

1
On

We know that $(3-\frac{17}{n})\in A$ for every $n\in\Bbb N$. Further, we know that every $a\in A$ satisfies $a\leq 3$ since $A\subseteq (-\infty,3]$.

These imply two things, if a supremum exists, it must be at least as large as $3$ (since $3-\frac{17}{n}$ gets arbitrarily close to $3$ and a supremum must be at least as large as each element) and further that it cannot be any larger than $3$ (since no elements larger than $3$ exist in $A$). Since it is a bounded set from above, a supremum must exist, and the observations here imply that it must be exactly three.


About the infimum however, we do not have enough information to conclude anything. It suffices to show two examples of sets $A$ where the hypotheses are satisfied, but they have different infimums.

Both $A=[-100,3)$ and $A'=[-1000,3]$ have $\{3-\frac{17}{n}~:~n\in\Bbb N\}$ as a subset and $(-\infty,3]$ as a superset, however $A$ has $-100$ as an infimum and $A'$ has $-1000$ as an infimum.

It is possible that there is no infimum as well, as is the case with $A''=(-\infty,3]$

0
On

The definition of the reals $R$ implies that there is no $x\in R$ such that $0<x<q$ for all $q\in Q^+.$ From this, it is immediate that for any $r\in R,$ there is no $x\in R$ such that $r-1/n<x<r$ for all $n\in N.$ And therefore $\sup \{r-1/n:n\in N\}=r.$ In your Q, $r=3.$

This property of the reals is not provable without a def'n of $R.$ It is possible to extend $Q,$ or $R $, to an arithmetic system $S$ with "infinitesimals" : Positive members of $S$ that are less than every positive rational. (And their reciprocals are greater than any natural number.)