The task is to implement function in Matlab that will solve numerically following function: $\sum _{k=0}^na_k\cos \left(kx\right)$ using Steffenson method and Goertzel for evaluating the series. I have working Steffenson method part, but no idea how to impelement Goertzel and how to combine it into. I'll be glad for any hint.
2026-04-13 19:12:25.1776107545
How to implement Steffenson method using Goertzel method for evaluating function values?
32 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in NUMERICAL-METHODS
- The Runge-Kutta method for a system of equations
- How to solve the exponential equation $e^{a+bx}+e^{c+dx}=1$?
- Is the calculated solution, if it exists, unique?
- Modified conjugate gradient method to minimise quadratic functional restricted to positive solutions
- Minimum of the 2-norm
- Is method of exhaustion the same as numerical integration?
- Prove that Newton's Method is invariant under invertible linear transformations
- Initial Value Problem into Euler and Runge-Kutta scheme
- What are the possible ways to write an equation in $x=\phi(x)$ form for Iteration method?
- Numerical solution for a two dimensional third order nonlinear differential equation
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
The Goertzel method is a generalization of the Horner scheme to evaluate trigonometric polynomials, originally for the extraction of single or few amplitudes from a Fourier transform. It essentially uses the trigonometric identity $$ \cos((k+1)x)+\cos((k-1)x)=2\cos x\cos(kx)$$ Inserting this identity into the expression gives \begin{align} \sum_{k=m}^{n}a_{k}\cos(kx) &=a_0+a_1\cos(x)+\sum_{k=2}^na_k[2\cos x\cos((k-1)x)-\cos((k-2)x)] \\ &=a_0-a_1\cos(x)+2\cos(x)\sum_{k=0}^{n-1}a_{k+1}\cos(kx)-\sum_{k=0}^{n-2}a_{k+2}\cos(kx). \end{align}
Thus setting $$s_m(x)=\sum_{k=0}^{n-m}a_{k+m}\cos(kx)$$ we get $$s_0(x)=a_0-a_1\cos(x)+2\cos(x)s_1(x)-s_2(x)$$ for the above equation and in general $$ s_{m-1}(x)=a_{m-1}+\cos(x)(2s_m(x)-a_m)-s_{m+1}(x) $$ which gives the implementation
If the compiler recognizes the multiplication with 2 and implements it as a simple increment in the binary exponent, the cost of this algorithm is the evaluation of the cosine, once, and $n$ multiplication, in total not much more than a polynomial evaluation of the same degree.