How to integrate $\int e^{-t^{2}} \space \, \mathrm dt $ using introductory calculus methods

26.2k Views Asked by At

Earlier today I stumbled across this when I was doing some practice questions for a physics course: $$\int e^{-t^2} \space \, \mathrm dt $$

To expand, the limits of integration were something like $1$ and $4$ (it was just a velocity function that needed to be integrated to find distance - it was not a known integral like $\int_0^\infty e^{-t^2} \space\, \mathrm dt$.)

Based on Wolfram|Alpha, it appears it cannot be expressed in elementary terms (i.e. it involves the error function.) Note that the questions involved the use of a calculator, so I was able to integrate the function using a CAS with ease, but I am wondering how to do it by hand. Thus, I was wondering if there was possibly a way to evaluate the integral using elementary methods from a calculus one or two course (read: no complex analysis). I thought there may perhaps be an elementary solution (I don't know what kind of algorithm Wolfram uses to evaluate integrals - I have seen them evaluate easy integrals in a lot of steps before.)

2

There are 2 best solutions below

1
On BEST ANSWER

The error function is defined as

$$\operatorname{erf}(x)=\frac 2 {\sqrt \pi}\int_{0}^x e^{-t^2}dt$$

It is not an elementary function. Since from the definition it is immediate (FTCI) that

$$\operatorname{erf}'(x)=\frac 2 {\sqrt \pi}e^{-x^2}$$

the primitive of $e^{-x^2}$ is expressible as

$$\int e^{-x^2} dx =\frac{\sqrt \pi}{2}\operatorname{erf}(x)-C $$

since any two primitives of a function $f$ differ by a constant (FTCII)

As a consequence your primitive can't be expressed in terms of elementary functions.

0
On

Your only hope is to spread out the first few terms of its Taylor series. Just substitute $-t^2$ into the exponential series $1 + x+ \frac{x^2}{2!} + \frac{x^3}{3!} +\frac{x^4}{4!}$ as far out as you can stand. When you make your substitution, you'll have an alternating sum which has some special properties to help you evaluate your error...and there will be error. There's no getting around it unless as you said you have convenient limits like $0$ to $+\infty$ which you already mentioned. Good Luck! This is just a less strenuous route which conveniently avoids using erf.