how can we prove by induction that a set of subtrees satisfies the Helly property of a tree T? i.e if a set of subtrees of T has the property that two of these subtrees have a common non-empty intersection, then the intersection of all the subtrees is also not empty
I have drawn out some trees to prove that this is true but I'm not sure how to formally write out the proof
First show that trivially it’s true if one of the subtrees has just one vertex. Then prove the following result by induction on the number of vertices in $T$:
Suppose that this is true for all trees with at most $n$ vertices, and let $T$ be a tree with $n+1$ vertices. Let $\mathscr{T}$ be a family of subtrees of $\mathscr{T}$ satisfying the conditions of the theorem. Let $v_0$ be a pendant vertex of $T$, let $v_1$ be its unique neighbor in $T$, and let $T'=T-v_0$. Let $\mathscr{T}'=\{S-v_0:S\in\mathscr{T}\}$.
Now apply the induction hypothesis to $T'$ and the family $\mathscr{T}'$ to conclude that $\bigcap\mathscr{T}'\ne\varnothing$ and therefore $\bigcap\mathscr{T}\ne\varnothing$.