$\displaystyle F(x) = \int_{x}^{x^2} \dfrac{t-1}{\ln^2t} \,dt$ and $F(1)=\ln(2)$ defined for all $x >1$
I have to prove that : for all $x >1 $: $\quad \dfrac{3}{2} \le \dfrac{F(x)-F(1)}{x-1} \le x^2\dfrac{x+2}{2}$
using the mean value theorem two times. The problem is that I tried using two ways: the first is to use the theorem to the function $F$ between $[1;x]$ or to the antiderivative of the function inside the integral between $[x,x^2]$ but it seems to not work.
I managed to prove it but I had to use the expression of $F'(x)$. How can I prove it wihout using it?
This is not an answer. Just an attempt of clarification of this interesting but puzzling question. Here is a graphical representation of function $F$ :
together with a representation of the line segment $[A,X]$ (where $A(1,$ln$(2))$ and $X=(x,F(x))$) whose slope is
$$s_x=\dfrac{F(x)-F(1)}{x-1}$$
One can find also on this figure point $M(x_0,F(x_0))$ such that, for a given x, one has a form of mean value theorem :
$$F'(x_0)=\dfrac{F(x)-F(1)}{x-1}$$
Assuming that $F$ is convex (to be established), we have a graphical proof of the first equality (the slope is always greater than the slope in $A$).
How to apply (twice !) mean value theorem to obtain in particular the RHS $x^2\frac{x+2}{2}$ as a bounding value.
However, I have an idea : the integrand can be written under the form :
$$\frac{t-1}{ln^2(t)-ln^2(1)}$$
which can be "bracketed" by using mean value theorem...
Final remark : You say you have a solution using $F'(x)$ that does not use mean value theorem. Can you say briefly what it is ?
Besides, I have a problem with $F'(x)$ : I find $F'(x)=\frac{(x-1)(x^2-x+2)}{2 ln(x)^2}$ but it does not match the (limit) value $3/2$ it should have for $x=1$.