Let $\phi_{+},\phi_{-} \in C^1(I_t)$ be such that $\phi_{+}^{'}(t)>f(t,\phi_{+}(t))$ and $\phi_{-}^{'}(t)<f(t,\phi_{-}(t))$, for all $t \in I_t$. If $\phi_{-}(t_0) \leq x_0 \leq \phi_{+}(t_0)$, for some $t_0 \in I_t$, then show that the solution $x=\phi(t)$, $t \in I_t$, of the IVP $x'=f(t,x), x(t_0)=x_0$ satisfies $\phi_{-}(t) < \phi (t)< \phi_{+}(t)$, $t \in (t_0,t_0+a)$.
2026-05-16 00:21:51.1778890911
how to show following estimate?
24 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in ORDINARY-DIFFERENTIAL-EQUATIONS
- The Runge-Kutta method for a system of equations
- Analytical solution of a nonlinear ordinary differential equation
- Stability of system of ordinary nonlinear differential equations
- Maximal interval of existence of the IVP
- Power series solution of $y''+e^xy' - y=0$
- Change of variables in a differential equation
- Dimension of solution space of homogeneous differential equation, proof
- Solve the initial value problem $x^2y'+y(x-y)=0$
- Stability of system of parameters $\kappa, \lambda$ when there is a zero eigenvalue
- Derive an equation with Faraday's law
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
geometry
circles
algebraic-number-theory
functions
real-analysis
elementary-set-theory
proof-verification
proof-writing
number-theory
elementary-number-theory
puzzle
game-theory
calculus
multivariable-calculus
partial-derivative
complex-analysis
logic
set-theory
second-order-logic
homotopy-theory
winding-number
ordinary-differential-equations
numerical-methods
derivatives
integration
definite-integrals
probability
limits
sequences-and-series
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
Suppose that $\phi(t)\geq \phi_+(t)$ for some $\stackrel{\sim}{t}\, >t_0$. Consider $h(t)=\phi(t)-\phi_+(t)$. We have $h(t_0)\leq 0$ and $h(\stackrel{\sim}{t}) \geq 0$. By the intermediate value theorem, we must have some $t\in \left[t_0,\stackrel{\sim}{t}\right]$ with $h(t)=0$. Let $t^*$ be the smallest such $t$ (why can we guarantee there is a smallest $t$?).
Moreover, consider that
$$h'(t)=\phi'(t)-\phi_+'(t)=f(t,\phi(t))-\phi_+'(t)\tag{1}$$
Now, suppose that $t^*=t_0$. In this case we'd have:
$$\phi_+'(t_0)>f(t_0,\phi_+(t_0))=f(t_0,\phi(t_0)),$$
so that $h'(t_0)<0$. This implies that $h$ is decreasing at $t_0$, and hence must be negative on $(t_0,t_0+a)$ for some $a>0$, which concludes this case.
Finally, suppose that $t^*>t_0$. Then $h$ must be negative on $[t_0,t^*)$ so we may take $a=t^*-t_0$.
The proof for $\phi_-$ is similar.