Let $U$ be the positive unipotent radical of $SL_n$ and $\mathfrak{n}$ the Lie algebra of $U$. How to show that $\mathcal{O}_q[U]$ is isomorphic to $U_q(\mathfrak{n})$? Here $\mathcal{O}_q[U]$ is the quantum coordinate ring of $U$ and $U_q(\mathfrak{n})$ is the quantized universal enveloping algebra of $\mathfrak{n}$. Thank you very much.
2026-03-25 16:02:02.1774454522
How to show that $\mathcal{O}_q[U]$ is isomorphic to $U_q(\mathfrak{n})$?
102 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in REPRESENTATION-THEORY
- How does $\operatorname{Ind}^G_H$ behave with respect to $\bigoplus$?
- Minimal dimension needed for linearization of group action
- How do you prove that category of representations of $G_m$ is equivalent to the category of finite dimensional graded vector spaces?
- Assuming unitarity of arbitrary representations in proof of Schur's lemma
- Are representation isomorphisms of permutation representations necessarily permutation matrices?
- idempotent in quiver theory
- Help with a definition in Serre's Linear Representations of Finite Groups
- Are there special advantages in this representation of sl2?
- Properties of symmetric and alternating characters
- Representation theory of $S_3$
Related Questions in LIE-ALGEBRAS
- Holonomy bundle is a covering space
- Computing the logarithm of an exponentiated matrix?
- Need help with notation. Is this lower dot an operation?
- On uniparametric subgroups of a Lie group
- Are there special advantages in this representation of sl2?
- $SU(2)$ adjoint and fundamental transformations
- Radical of Der(L) where L is a Lie Algebra
- $SU(3)$ irreps decomposition in subgroup irreps
- Given a representation $\phi: L \rightarrow \mathfrak {gl}(V)$ $\phi(L)$ in End $V$ leaves invariant precisely the same subspaces as $L$.
- Tensors transformations under $so(4)$
Related Questions in ALGEBRAIC-GROUPS
- How do you prove that category of representations of $G_m$ is equivalent to the category of finite dimensional graded vector spaces?
- How to realize the character group as a Lie/algebraic/topological group?
- Action of Unipotent algebraic group
- From a compact topological group to a commutative Hopf algebra
- When do we have $C(G) \otimes C(G) =C(G\times G)?$
- What is the internal Hom object in the category $\mathcal{C} = \mathbf{Rep}_k(G)$?
- Is the product of simply connected algebraic groups simply connected?
- Connected subgroup of $(K^\times)^n$ of Zariski dimension 1
- Action of $ \mathbb{G}_m $ on $ \mathbb{A}^n $ by multiplication.
- Book recommendation for Hopf algebras
Related Questions in QUANTUM-GROUPS
- Verma module $V(\lambda)$ of $U_q(\mathfrak{sl}_2)$ is not simple $\implies$ $\lambda = \pm q^n$
- Structure of simple modules of $U_q(\mathfrak{sl}_2)$ at a root of unity.
- What are $q$-deformations?
- Intuition behind the relation of commutative Hopf algebra and Groups
- Definition of the Quantum plane and the Yang Baxter Equation
- Quantum invariants of 2-knots
- Integrable modules of quantum groups.
- Bogoliubov Transform
- Reference on correspondence between commutative Hopf Algebras and Groups
- What is the relation between crystals and crystal bases?
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
If I remember correctly this can be found in Joseph "Quantum groups and primitive ideals", I'll later add the correct reference. EDIT It is the content of 9.2.12, if I am not mistaken (notations do not make this an easy book to jump in...)
One way of seeing it can be the following. It follows from the analogous statement about $U_q(\mathfrak b^+)\simeq {\cal O}(B_-)$. This can be seen as a consequence of the fact that there exists a perfect Hopf algebra pairing between $U_q(\mathfrak b^+)$ and $U_q(\mathfrak b^-)^{op}$ (explicit, e.g. Klimyk-Schmudgen page 184) using which one can identify $U_q(\mathfrak b^+)$ with ${\cal O}_q(B_-)$. There is a little bit of hand-waving going on here because one has to be very clear whether he is working with $\mathbb C$--algebras or $\mathbb C[[\hbar ]]$ algebras or $\mathbb C(q)$--algebras.
A possible way of seeing this is as an issue of Drinfeld's quantum duality principle, since w. r. to the natural Poisson--Lie group structure $\pi$, $(B^+,\pi)$ and $(B^-,-\pi)$ are Poisson dual groups.