How can i understand of the free module $K[x]^r=\bigoplus_{i=r}^rK[x]e_i$ where $e_i=(0,\ldots ,1, \ldots 0) \in K[x]^r $ denotes the i–th canonical basis vector of $K[x]^r$. We call $x^\alpha e_i=(0, \ldots , x^\alpha , \ldots 0)$ a monomial. For a monomial $x^\alpha e_i \in K[x]^r$ set $\operatorname{deg} x^\alpha e_i:=\operatorname{deg} x^\alpha=\alpha_1+\cdots+\alpha_n$ But im confused because i think $\alpha$ is a monomial just can be a element of $\mathbb{Z}$ because we are working with polynomials in just one variable?can you explain me? any example?
2026-03-26 10:07:06.1774519626
How to understand Free Module $K[x]^r=\bigoplus_{i=r}^rK[x]e_i$
46 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in ABSTRACT-ALGEBRA
- Feel lost in the scheme of the reducibility of polynomials over $\Bbb Z$ or $\Bbb Q$
- Integral Domain and Degree of Polynomials in $R[X]$
- Fixed points of automorphisms of $\mathbb{Q}(\zeta)$
- Group with order $pq$ has subgroups of order $p$ and $q$
- A commutative ring is prime if and only if it is a domain.
- Conjugacy class formula
- Find gcd and invertible elements of a ring.
- Extending a linear action to monomials of higher degree
- polynomial remainder theorem proof, is it legit?
- $(2,1+\sqrt{-5}) \not \cong \mathbb{Z}[\sqrt{-5}]$ as $\mathbb{Z}[\sqrt{-5}]$-module
Related Questions in RING-THEORY
- Jacobson radical = nilradical iff every open set of $\text{Spec}A$ contains a closed point.
- A commutative ring is prime if and only if it is a domain.
- Find gcd and invertible elements of a ring.
- Prove that $R[x]$ is an integral domain if and only if $R$ is an integral domain.
- Prove that $Z[i]/(5)$ is not a field. Check proof?
- If $P$ is a prime ideal of $R[x;\delta]$ such as $P\cap R=\{0\}$, is $P(Q[x;\delta])$ also prime?
- Let $R$ be a simple ring having a minimal left ideal $L$. Then every simple $R$-module is isomorphic to $L$.
- A quotient of a polynomial ring
- Does a ring isomorphism between two $F$-algebras must be a $F$-linear transformation
- Prove that a ring of fractions is a local ring
Related Questions in MODULES
- Idea to make tensor product of two module a module structure
- $(2,1+\sqrt{-5}) \not \cong \mathbb{Z}[\sqrt{-5}]$ as $\mathbb{Z}[\sqrt{-5}]$-module
- Example of simple modules
- $R$ a domain subset of a field $K$. $I\trianglelefteq R$, show $I$ is a projective $R$-module
- $S_3$ action on the splitting field of $\mathbb{Q}[x]/(x^3 - x - 1)$
- idempotent in quiver theory
- Isomorphism of irreducible R-modules
- projective module which is a submodule of a finitely generated free module
- Exercise 15.10 in Cox's Book (first part)
- direct sum of injective hull of two modules is equal to the injective hull of direct sum of those modules
Related Questions in GRADED-RINGS
- Extending a linear action to monomials of higher degree
- Direct sum and the inclusion property
- High-degree pieces of graded ideal with coprime generators
- Bihomogeneous Nullstellensatz
- The super group $GL(1|1)$
- Properties of the Zariski topology on Proj
- Localization of a graded ring at degree zero
- Adams operations and an artificial grading on K-theory
- On "homogeneous" height and "homogeneous" Krull-dimension?
- Units are homogeneous in $\mathbb Z$-graded domains
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
It is a common shorthand in commutative algebra to write $K[x]$ to mean polynomials in a finite number of variables $x_1,\dots, x_n$ with coefficients in a field $K$. As you note, this is a slight abuse of notation, since $K[x]$ does look like it's one variable. Some authors try to disambiguate with notations like $K[\mathbf{x}]$ or $K[X]$, but others do not.
As noted in the comments, this question arises from reading Greuel and Pfister's A Singular Introduction to Commutative Algebra. In the edition I am referencing, this material looks like it appears in Section 2.3, "Standard Bases for Modules." From what I can see, the authors have up to this point freely used the notation $K[x]$ for both single-variable and the $n$-variable polynomial rings. See for instance the subalgebra membership problem in 1.8.11 as well as various exercises in that section.
Therefore, we should interpret $\alpha$ as an element of $\mathbb{N}^n$ (where $0\in\mathbb{N}$) and then $x^\alpha$ in the usual manner, e.g. $x^{(3,1,0,0,2)}=x_1^3x_2x_5^2$. Note that in general this $n$ is the number of variables in the ring, and does not need to be equal to the rank of the free module $r$; the two "vectors" appearing in the notation $x^\alpha e_i$ are unrelated.