I am pretty new to geometric topology and I am struggling to solve this problem. I have tried to approach this a lot of different ways and I will spare you the drawings. I am trying to undo this portion of a link that you would use type I moves for, but only using type II and type II moves.
2026-03-25 11:19:16.1774437556
How to undo a type I Reidemeister move only using type II and type III moves?
166 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in GEOMETRIC-TOPOLOGY
- Finite covers of handlebodies?
- CW complexes are compactly generated
- Constructing a fat Cantor Set with certain property
- Homologically zero circles in smooth manifolds
- Labeled graphs with unimodular adjacency matrix
- Pseudoisotopy between nonisotopic maps
- A topological question about loops and fixed points
- "Continuity" of volume function on hyperbolic tetrahedra
- Example of path connected metric space whose hyperspace with Vietoris topology is not path connected?
- What is the pushout of $D^n \longleftarrow S^{n-1} \longrightarrow D^n$?
Related Questions in KNOT-THEORY
- Is unknot a composite knot?
- Can we modify one component of a link and keep the others unchanged
- Can we split a splittable link by applying Reidemeister moves to non-self crossings only
- Involution of the 3 and 4-holed torus and its effects on some knots and links
- Equivalence polygonal knots with smooth knots
- Can a knot diagram be recovered from this data?
- Does Seifert's algorithm produce Seifert surfaces with minimal genus?
- Equivalence of links in $R^3$ or $S^3$
- Homotopy type of knot complements
- The complement of a knot is aspherical
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
Type I moves change the writhe of a link diagram by $\pm 1$, where type II and type III moves leave writhe invariant. Restricting your moves to types II and III is called regular isotopy (though for diagrams in $\mathbb{R}^2$ there is usually a type I' move where you insert a canceling pair of type I moves), which is more restrictive.
It might be helpful if you give a diagram of the link in question.
With the diagram you've now posted in mind, this is a case where the writhes cancel and there is a sequence of moves of types II and III. See for example https://mathoverflow.net/a/162729/43804, but note that they used II followed by III to get from the first to second diagram. This figure shows how you can think of this as sort of untwisting out of a thick rope: https://www.researchgate.net/figure/The-Whitney-trick_fig9_47820408 (you can think of the reverse as taking a portion of a long rope then twisting that portion about an axis perpendicular to the diagram).
I would suggest finding some thick rope (which resists changes in writhe, so therefore type I moves) and see how it helps you obtain a move sequence.