"There exists an Apple such that for every person, he loves that apple."
I believe the translation is:
$$\exists x(\forall y((\text{Apple}(x) \wedge \text{Person}(y)) \to \text{Loves}(y,x)))$$
would that be correct?
Thanks!
"There exists an Apple such that for every person, he loves that apple."
I believe the translation is:
$$\exists x(\forall y((\text{Apple}(x) \wedge \text{Person}(y)) \to \text{Loves}(y,x)))$$
would that be correct?
Thanks!
Copyright © 2021 JogjaFile Inc.
Close but no cigar. The correct answer is:
$$\exists x(\mathrm{Apple}(x) \wedge \forall y(\mathrm{Person}(y) \rightarrow \mathrm{Loves}(y,x)))$$
To see that your answer isn't quite right, consider a universe with one person and no apples. Then the implication is vacuously true (since $\mathrm{Apple}(x)$ is false). So the statement you wrote down becomes
$$∃x∀y \,\mathrm{True}$$
which is vacuously true. So the statement you wrote down is satisfied by a universe in which there are no apples. Therefore, it cannot capture the meaning of a sentence of the form: "There exists an apple such that [whatever]."
Edit. The general principle is this.
"For all apples $x$ [whatever]" = "For all $x$, if $x$ is an apple then [whatever]."
"There exists an apple $x$ such that [whatever]" = "There exists $x$ such that $x$ is an apple, and [whatever]."