My text (Stewart's Early transcendentals) is going into hyperbolic functions, but I'm a bit confused about some statements they are making. All I know about hyperbolic functions is that the distances between a point on the hyperbola and the two foci are constant. IT's the locus of all these points I think. This text I find confusing:
On the circle... if the angle is $\frac{\pi}{6}$, the area is $\frac{\pi}{6}$ too right? The area isn't double? Say the radius is 1, that means the area is $\pi \cdot r^2 = \pi$ and we divide the area the area by 6 because of the radian measure. But why does the text say the trig case t represents twice the area of the shaded sector?
What does $\cosh{t}$ represent?
Why does $\sinh{x}$ equal $\frac{e^x - e^{-x}}{2}$?

EDIT: I saw you commented the other answer about this, so here's a full explanation. At angle x, you're cutting off a proportion of the circle's circumference. In fact, if C is the circumference of the circle, you're cutting off precisely $$\frac{x}{2\pi}*C,$$ right? Because cutting off a circle's circumference cuts off the same proportion of the area (if you think about the line from the origin to the point), then replacing that C with the area, A, works. Test this out with x being pi or half pi and so in. In the case, where our circle has radius 1, then we have: $$\frac{x}{2\pi}A = \frac{x}{2\pi}\pi = \frac{x}{2} $$ Thus our area is half the angle (or, our angle is double the area).
cosh(t) is the x co-ordinate of the point, and sin(t) is the y co-ordinate, just as with sin and cos, except the object whose points we're taking is a hyperbola instead of a circle.
See other answers