I have a matrix defined this way :
$m_{ij} = 0$ if $j < i - 1$ or if $j > i +1$
$m_{ij} = 1$ if $j = i - 1$
$m_{ij} = 3$ if $j = i$
$m_{ij} = 2$ if $j = i + 1$
Therefore for matrix size 1x1 I have : $$ \begin{bmatrix} 3 \end{bmatrix} $$
For size 2x2 I have : $$ \begin{bmatrix} 3 & 2\\ 1 & 3 \end{bmatrix} $$
3x3 :
$$
\begin{bmatrix}
3 & 2 & 0\\
1 & 3 & 2\\
0 & 1 & 3
\end{bmatrix}
$$
For 4x4 :
$$
\begin{bmatrix}
3 & 2 & 0 & 0\\
1 & 3 & 2 & 0\\
0 &1 & 3 & 2\\
0 &0 & 1 & 3
\end{bmatrix}
$$
We note $d_n$ the determinant of matrix of size $n*n$ I am asked to prove (using induction) that $\forall n\ge 3, d_n = 3d_{n-1} - 2d_{n-2}$ , I do see why it works like that, but I have a hard time explaining it in concise mathematical terms...
How can I do that? Thank you!
Begin with the first couple of cases $d_3$ and $d_4$, which are easy to see. Then for the inductive step simply use the rules of determinants (see https://people.richland.edu/james/lecture/m116/matrices/determinant.html) and expand along the top row of the n'th matrix to see the formula for $d_n$.
If you don't know about the expansion rule for determinants just give it a search - there's plenty of material out there.
EDIT: a quick edit to explain general inductive reasoning in case you aren't sure:
Do the first couple of cases by hand (sometimes called the 'base cases')
Assume the hypothesis for some $k < n$ (or all $k < n$ for strong induction)
Show that the $k+1$ formula follows from knowing the hypothesis above
Then since you know the first couple of cases for $n = 1,2$ it follows that the hypothesis is true for $n =3,4,5...$