What I don't understand:
I don't understand why in the proof
det(Q) = $λa_{i1}C_{i1}$(A) + $λa_{i2}C_{i2}$(A) + ... + $λa_{in}C_{in}$(A).
Shouldn't the det(Q) = $λa_{i1}C_{i1}$(Q) + $λa_{i2}C_{i2}$(Q) + ... + $λa_{in}C_{in}$(Q)?
What I don't understand:
I don't understand why in the proof
det(Q) = $λa_{i1}C_{i1}$(A) + $λa_{i2}C_{i2}$(A) + ... + $λa_{in}C_{in}$(A).
Shouldn't the det(Q) = $λa_{i1}C_{i1}$(Q) + $λa_{i2}C_{i2}$(Q) + ... + $λa_{in}C_{in}$(Q)?
Copyright © 2021 JogjaFile Inc.


The determinant is evaluated according to the $i$th row and so the equation in the proof is correct.