am confuse why here divide by(p-1) I know it is permutations case bt which case is apply here
2026-03-28 10:41:40.1774694500
I try to prove this bt am confuse why divided by (p-1) .I know it is permutations question bt which case apply here
36 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in LINEAR-ALGEBRA
- An underdetermined system derived for rotated coordinate system
- How to prove the following equality with matrix norm?
- Alternate basis for a subspace of $\mathcal P_3(\mathbb R)$?
- Why the derivative of $T(\gamma(s))$ is $T$ if this composition is not a linear transformation?
- Why is necessary ask $F$ to be infinite in order to obtain: $ f(v)=0$ for all $ f\in V^* \implies v=0 $
- I don't understand this $\left(\left[T\right]^B_C\right)^{-1}=\left[T^{-1}\right]^C_B$
- Summation in subsets
- $C=AB-BA$. If $CA=AC$, then $C$ is not invertible.
- Basis of span in $R^4$
- Prove if A is regular skew symmetric, I+A is regular (with obstacles)
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
If you want to understand the why of the numerator, see Marcus M's answer to the question
$\qquad$What is the number of invertible $n\times n$ matrices in $\operatorname{GL}_n(F)$?
As to your question about why there is a denominator of $p-1$, it can be explained as follows . . .
Fix a positive integer $n$.
Let $X$ be the set of $n\times n$ matrices with entries in $Z_p$ which are non-singular, mod $p$.
For each $d \in Z_p\setminus\{0\}$, let $X_d = \{A \in X\mid (\det(A)\;\text{mod}\; p) = d\}$.
Claim: The sets $S_d$ all have the same cardinality.
To prove it, let $d,e \in Z_p\setminus \{0\}$.
Define $f:X_d\to X_e$ as follows . . .
For each matrix $A \in X_d$, let $f(A)$ be the matrix whose first row is the first row of $A$ scaled, mod $p$, by ${\large{\frac{e}{d}}}$, and all of whose other entries are the same as the corresponding entries in $A$.
It's easily seen that $f$ is injective.
Thus, $|X_d| \le |X_e|$.
Using the same reasoning, we can get an injective function from $X_e$ to $X_d$, hence $|X_e| \le |X_d|$.
Thus, $|X_d|=|X_e|$, as claimed.
Since $|Z_p\setminus \{0\}|=p-1$, and all the sets $X_d$ have the same cardinality, it follows that $$|X_d|=\frac{|X|}{p-1}$$ which explains the reason for dividing by $p-1$.