If a 2-form $\omega \in \Omega^n(M)$ is closed, is its contraction $\theta = \iota_X\omega$ also closed for any smooth vector field $X$ on $M$?
2026-03-30 13:53:44.1774878824
IF a 2-Form is Closed, is its Contraction along any Vector Field also Exact?
317 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in DIFFERENTIAL-FORMS
- Using the calculus of one forms prove this identity
- Relation between Fubini-Study metric and curvature
- Integration of one-form
- Time derivative of a pullback of a time-dependent 2-form
- Elliptic Curve and Differential Form Determine Weierstrass Equation
- I want the pullback of a non-closed 1-form to be closed. Is that possible?
- How to find 1-form for Stokes' Theorem?
- Verify the statement about external derivative.
- Understanding time-dependent forms
- form value on a vector field
Related Questions in SYMPLECTIC-GEOMETRY
- Linear algebra - Property of an exterior form
- Proof that 1-Form on a Symplectic Manifold is Closed?
- Time derivative of a pullback of a time-dependent 2-form
- Understanding time-dependent forms
- What is a symplectic form of the rotation group SO(n)
- Dimension of the Marsden-Weinstein reduction of a coadjoint orbit in the dual of the Lie algebra of the gauge group (Atiyah-Bott context)
- Symplectic form on the n-torus
- Computing the flow on the cotangent bundle
- Action-angle variables in non-compact level sets
- About the tangent space of a coadjoint orbit
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
As the comments say, the answer is no in general. Here is a simple example, done explicitly (mostly for my own practice, but I hope it's useful to see calculations in coordinates).
Consider $M=\mathbb{R}^3-\left\{(0,0,0)\right\}$, and take $\omega$ to be the pullback of the volume form $\sin\phi\,d\phi\wedge d\theta$ of the unit sphere $S^2$ under the map
$$\alpha:M\to S^{2}, \alpha(p)=\frac{p}{\|p\|}$$
Then $\omega$ is closed because the pullback commutes with exterior differentiation, and of course the volume form on the sphere is closed. Explicitly, with $r=\|p\|$ for $p\in M$,
$$\omega=\frac{1}{r^3}\left(z\,dx\wedge dy+y\,dx\wedge dz+x\,dy\wedge dz\right)$$
Now take $X$ to be the field $X:M\to M$ defined by $$X(p)=\frac{p}{\|p\|}=\frac{1}{r}\left(x\,\partial_x+y\,\partial_y+z\,\partial_z\right)$$
Then, with $X_1=x_1\partial_X+y_1\partial y+z_1\partial_z$,
$$\theta(X_1)=\iota_X\omega(X_1)=\omega(X, X_1)=\frac{1}{r^4}\big(z(xy_1-yx_1)+y(xz_1-zx_1)+x(yz_1-zy_1)\big)$$
so
$$\theta=\frac{1}{r^4}\left(-2yz\,dx+2xy\,dz\right)$$
whence
$$d\theta=-2d\left(\frac{yz}{r^4}\right)\wedge dx+2d\left(\frac{xy}{r^4}\right)\wedge dz$$
This can't vanish; the first term will have a nonzero multiple of $dx\wedge dy$, for example, but there is no multiple of $dx\wedge dy$ in the second term to cancel it.
Intuitively, recall that Cartan's formula says
$$L_X\omega=d(\iota_X\omega)+\iota_X(d\omega)$$
The second term on the right vanishes since $\omega$ is closed. But for $X$ and $\omega$ in our example, the Lie derivative doesn't vanish: as we flow along $X$ the form $\omega$ is changing.